Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 12. mT <br />(Item #4 - McKinney - Cominucd) <br />Cily Altotney Bairetl stated the City efToneously determined the number of units to be <br />one, yean wg/o, and is now recovering the water and sewer access fees Barrett said the <br />City is acting consistent with the statute and has the legal authority to recover said <br />charges <br />Mayor Callahan stated the Council will follow Barrett s advice that the City has the <br />Milhofily to make these charges Councilmembers voiced their opinions with compassion <br />for apphcwt's hardship, possible availability of grants, but felt a precedent would be set if <br />tins charge was dismissed In response to Barrett's comments. Eidsen replied he feh the <br />assumption of misassessment is not correct <br />Neighbors, Mike Anderson, Greg Goodfellow, and Karen Cuff v oiced concerns over the <br />fttiure of the applicant to meet all conditions of the conditional-use permit citing <br />examples of illegal parking, bedroom sleeping arrangements without proper egress, and <br />number of people dwelling in the residence <br />Callahan stated the main concern here was the SAC charges. Mabusth said this was true <br />but applicant must meet the conditional-use permit requirements as well. Mabusth stated <br />an inspection found requirements completed and satisfory with the exception of a garage <br />being misused as storage Gayle Siegler addressed the use of the garage stall as <br />storage stating this will be remedied by winter Siegler instructed the tenants that the <br />lower level was not to be used as a bedroom <br />Callahan said the Council will not revoke the conditional-use permit as the applicant has <br />the right to use the property as a duplex. Jrfibour stated the Council mend)ers will <br />uphold the conditions of the permit Huir and Goetten agreed to enforcement and the <br />need to set a time limit to meet the conditions Kelley asked that all matters be resolved <br />by next meeting and for Mabusth to check that this was done <br />Neighbor Anderson asked the opinion ot the City Attorney on the multi-use issue <br />Barrett said pan of the problem with pre-existing use is in the zoning and arises not out <br />of a City ordinance but with the Constitution of the United Slates The question is at <br />what point a City would be found to have "taken" a property Barrett believes the <br />continual use may raise that constitutional issue but within the context of our ordinances, <br />as well as the constitution, allows continuance of use if used continually Because of this, <br />the owner has the right to use the property as a duplex The device of a conditional-use <br />permit is used by the City to know what the non-conforming uses are and what the <br />dimensions and limits are of the use <br />The neighbors asked for clarification of the best process in which to report violations of <br />the conditional-use permit It was determined that phone calls tor expediency with <br />follow-up letters for the City to have in print is the best method