My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
09-12-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 10:56:33 AM
Creation date
12/11/2023 10:51:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L <br />Zoning File #1950 <br />August 10, 1994 <br />Page 3 <br />Per Exhibits G and H, the addition is a single story <br />Review Exhibit J. according to the Cit>'s topographic maps, the existing house and <br />proposed additions will be out of the flood plain at the 931.5 elevation. Applicant should <br />provide more detailed topographic (spot elevation) information with survey submitted with <br />building permit. <br />Statement of Hardships <br />1.All five houses served by the private drive are located within the 0-75' setback area, <br />refer to Exhibit B. <br />2.Approximately 8,742 s.f. of utility and private driveway easement area cannot be <br />credited against lot area nor can this area be used for residential construction. <br />3.The only area available for residential construction is located entirely within the <br />lakeshore protected area. <br />4. A residence has existed on this property for over 50 years. <br />5. The property is served with sewer. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Is the proposed improvement too ambitious for this limited property? <br />Should the structure be moved closer to east side of easement to minimize the intensity <br />of the lakeshore setback variance? <br />3. What existing or proposed hardcover improvements can be reduced or removed? <br />110 s.f. or 1.3% landscape area underlain with plastic <br />12’ X 22’ proposed deck at 264 s.f. or 3.1% <br />600 s.f. connecting addition at 7.2% <br />Options of Action <br />Denial of application as proposed. Refer to the necessary findings in Section 10.08, <br />Subdivision 3 (A) (1-12); <br />OR
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.