My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
08-22-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 10:22:30 AM
Creation date
12/11/2023 10:19:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
planning C0IV1IV1ISSI0N MINUTES CITY OF ORONO NOVEMBER 15, 1993 <br />jSiSfid Gary DeSantis/Sailors World . . <br />1955 Shoreline Drive - Variances - continuation of Public Hearing <br />Buiidinq and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth gave the staff report. Gary DeSantis, the <br />applicant, was present and explained tne lack of storage space was a hardship ana he <br />requested the Planning Commiss.cn to approve his request. He stated the DNR was <br />concerned about locating the proposed storage module as tar away from the water as <br />nossible He stated he was willing tc provide landscaping and screening to buffer the module <br />?ror^ me v^w fmm the roadway. He stated that Ceil Strauss of the DNR had said she would <br />send a letter to the Plannino Commission stating that the proposed location was acceptable. <br />Mr DeSantis discussed the exterior appearance of the building and exola.neo wny it was not <br />feasible to make an addition onto the existing builcmg because of the existing winoow ana <br />door placement. <br />Commissioner Nolan inquired how much the setback variance would be if the mociuie wer^ <br />placed as shown on the plans and Ms. Mabusth responoed that it would requite a -0 <br />setback variance. Mr. DeSantis stated that the position of the module ^ <br />was the position selected by the DNR. He noted that it could be moved ir the Planning <br />Commission preforred 3 diffGrent loc3tion. <br />Chairman Schroeder stated he was sympathetic to the applicant's <br />supportive of the proposed location. Commissioner Peterson inquired ™.® <br />movable, and Mr. DeSantis responded that it could be moved frorn one <br />it were placed directly on the asphalt and not on a foundation. Ms. Mabus. n^saniis <br />that the structure was designed to blend in with the principal structure. Mr. Debantis <br />reviewed the proposed landscaping to screen the storage module. <br />Commissioner Nolan inquired about the trash enclosure and whether the or the ^ <br />occupied by a walkway was necessary, and Mr. DeSantis responded -'^'^^^tively^ <br />Discussion ensued regarding the feasibility of constructing an addition onto he ^>^'st <br />building. Mr. DeSantis explained why this was not practicable because of the plac.m <br />windows and doors in the principal structure. <br />Commissioner Lindquist moved, Peterson seconded,._t;o °i:i,:;c:lv <br />setback to allow a storaoe module to be pla ced on Space without a oyn <br />on the asphalt, subject to the following stipulations: <br />1, The applicant provide a landscape plan for staff review and approval for screening o' <br />the proposed storage module. <br />2. The doors of the storage module face away from the street. <br />Commissioners Schroeder, Nolan, Peterson, and Lindquist voted aye . Motion ca
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.