Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File ^1938 <br />June 13. 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />Application <br />Applicants’ Addendum <br />Property Owners ’ List <br />Plat Map <br />D - Hardcover Worksheets <br />E • Floor Plans <br />F • Elevations <br />G - Existing Site Plan <br />H • Proposed Site Plan <br />I - Average Lakeshore Setback <br />Description of Request <br />Applicants propose the demolition of the existing residence and construction of a two- <br />story residence structure that would be located 16 ’ from the street lot line requiring a street <br />setback variance and setback variance from the bhiff as structure wilt be located anywhere from <br />0-6 ’ from top of bluff. Hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area exists at 15.01% and is now <br />proposed at 31.4% requiring a 6.42% hardcover variatKe, more than doubling the size of the <br />existing improvement. <br />Review Exhibit A-1, applicants’ addendum. Applicant notes the excessive right-of-way <br />dedication at the street side of the residence shown at an 80* width and the location of the <br />travelled road from the street lot line. Applicant notes some 2800 -f- s.f. of additional area <br />between travelled road and street lot line that provides additional absorption area for hardcover. <br />Based on the existing and proposed final elevations, all drainage from the new improvements <br />will be directed towards street. Review Exhibit I, the proposed improvements will not visually <br />impact existing residences on either side, note residence to south has been constructed within <br />upper elevations of bluff. Applicant also notes that all other required setbacks have been met. <br />Note grade level deck at southwest comer is not required to meet a 10’ setback hut can be <br />located as close as 5’ to lot line. <br />Applicant has also advised that there may be a need to excavate at the southeast comer <br />of proposed residence in order to provide positive drainage towards street. Applicant intends <br />to install a swale. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Is the 6.42% increase in hardcover reasonable for property at 18,849 s.f.? Note <br />applicant has not provided hardcover facts within the 0-75’ setback area. Staff will ask <br />applicant to provide this information for the meeting in order to determine if there are <br />improvements that can be considered for removal.