Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />i» <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers <br />Ron Moorse. City Administrator <br />Michael P. Gaffron. Assistant Planning & Zoning Administratoi <br />June 21, 1993 <br />Shoreland Ordinance - DNR Approval <br />List of Exhibits <br />DNR Letter Dated 5/25/93 With AttachmentA - <br />Pift-pn months after our adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance, the DNR has finally issued <br />rttir orHinance The letter indicates approval of our flexibility request <br />a letter formally approvmg ordinance The conditional approval indicates mainly items <br />zoning code amendment. To briefly review their list of four conditional items. <br />1. <br />■7 <br />3. <br />These are merely statute recodifications. <br />W- can certainly add 'lockbox'' to the definition of water-oriented accessory <br />Lcmres Note that by defmition. 'stairways, fences, Jocks and retatmng walls <br />are nos considered water-oriented accessory structures. Our current definition <br />reads: <br />"24 Water-oriented accessory structure or facility. A small above- <br />■ound building or other improvement, except suirways, fences, docks, <br />and retaining walls, which, because of the relationship of ns use to a <br />surface water feature, reasonably needs to be located closer to pu <br />waters than the normal structure setback. Examples of such structures and <br />facilities include boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump <br />houses, and detached decks." <br />We would merely add "lockboxes" to this list of examples. Council will <br />remember ihai a different section of the Shoreland Ordinate r^es <br />the examples ate allowed in the lakeshore setback zone other than the lockbox. <br />in the -intensive vegetation cl. aring' section of our ordinance.^ Mtrt ttat ^uejh <br />activity couldn't occur in the 0-75' zone or on steep slopes. The DNR <br />to include "bluff impact zone ' as another area where intensive vegetati % <br />isn’t allowed. This seems reasonable. They also suggest we expan <br />zone to include uluff impact zone in regards to the prohibition on cutting <br />larger trees, which also seems reasonable. <br />*