Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1933 <br />June 16, 1994 <br />Page 3 <br />Review of Second Phase Subdivision <br />Lot Configuration <br />All lots meet the required two acres of dry contiguous lands exclusive of designated <br />wetlands and retention treatment ponds. Note the designated wetland within Lot 16 has not been <br />shown as a drainage easement. The lot area should be amended to include total dry buildable <br />exclusive of wetland area. Lots 15 and 18 (Coffin property) do not meet the required width <br />along cul-de-sac. Lots 15. 16. 17, 18 and 19 (Dickey property) are classified as through lots <br />and conditional use permits would be required for any accessory structure installed at some <br />future date. As already noted above in the factual findings. Lots 16 and 17 are served by a <br />driveway outlot that has been placed over an existing driveway that served the Coffin residence <br />within Lot 16. As in the first phase review, the road layout and driveway access serving Lots <br />16 and 17 were conceptually approved by both Planning Commission and Council during the <br />sketch plan review phase. The issue of applicability must be addressed in this review. A loop <br />road connecting northern cul-de-sac road with Watertown Road would have a major impact on <br />the desimiated'wetland. In the conceptual review of the application, the City deemed it not <br />necessary to have a loop road connecting Old Cr>'stal Bay Road to Watertown Road. The <br />installation of a private road within the area defined as Outlot C would also impact existing <br />development, specifically adjacent to the existing driveway at the intersection ot Watertown <br />Road. The north side yard of Lot 17 should be adjusted to a 45* width. Lot 15 ’s side setback <br />should be adjusted to 50’ adjacent to Outlot B (Coffin property). <br />Cl rad i m? / D ra i na ge/Wet I a nd s <br />As already noted above in the status report, the only agency still to complete the review <br />of the comprehensive grading and drainage plan is the Corps. Mitigation areas have been <br />approved. The issue for the Corps is the resolve of the amount ol fill to be placed within Lots <br />17 and 18 (Dickey property). <br />There was concern with drainage coming from northeast comer ot Dickey parcel <br />eventuallv to the Luce Line. As noted by developer during the first phase review, a retention <br />pond is pn.iposed within Lot 8 (Dickey). Drainage will drain from pond along Willow Drive <br />throuizh the DNR park under Luce Line via a 48" culvert that carries drainage through a swale <br />eventuallv south along Willow (review Exhibit P). The developer shall provide increased <br />storage capacity at the noriheasi corner of the Dickey property to mininii/e any impact on <br />existinc developed properties in Countryside neighborhood. <br />Parks/Trails/Park Dedication <br />The City will ask for a park dedication fee foi the .second phase subdivision. Applicant <br />should respond to placement of interior trail within designated wetlands. We did not address