Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1915 <br />April 14, 1994 <br />Paee 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Owners List <br />D - Neighbors Acknowledgment Forms <br />E - Existing Survey <br />F - Topographic Surveys - Location of Bluff <br />Gl-3 - Sections <br />H - Existing Hardcover Inventory 0-75 ’ <br />I - Proposed Hardcover Inventorv' 0-75 ’ <br />K - 0-75 ’ Site Plan <br />L - Existing Hard, 'ver Inventory 75-250 ’ <br />M - Site Plan ot Existing Hardcover 75-250 ’ <br />N - 75-250 ’ Hardcover Inventory <br />O - Site Plan of Proposed Hardcover 75-250 ’ <br />PI-2 - Floor Plans. <br />Q - Elevations <br />R - Section of Structure <br />S - Proposed Site Plan <br />Description of Request <br />The application involves the removal of the existing detached garage at 18.9’xl6 8' and <br />installing an attached garage approximately 24’x27 ’ to be relocated at least 10 front the edge <br />of the risht-of-way. Applicant proposes the enclosure of the existing lakeside deck and a second <br />story addition. The improvements also include a lakeside deck than will be installed right to the <br />top of the defined bluff. The existing single storv residence is limited to two bedrooms. The <br />upper level expansion will provide much needed bedroom area for applicant ’s older children. <br />Note the garage will be at two levels providing additional storage area at lower level. Applicant <br />also proposes'^ installation of expanded basement beneath lakeside addition. In a recent site <br />inspection, the applicant advised that there will be no overhang structure above lower level doors <br />of garage. Elevations of garage show an overhead structure. It is not clear ^ <br />information submitted whether existing foundation will be replaced and a new one installer . <br />Applicant should advise if current foundation has been evaluated to determine if it can sustain <br />second story. <br />Applicant proposes a reduction of some 12.7% hardcover improvements within the 0-75 ’ and <br />an increase of 9.5% within the 75-250 ’ setback area. The improvements result in an excess of <br />structural coverage for the site at 1.7%.