Laserfiche WebLink
(9/s^ <br />Zoning File U\%2A' <br />May 11, 1994 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />As applicant's facts reveal, there has been a reduction in lot area which has au impact <br />on lot coverase facts and hardcover facts when comparing them to the original facmal <br />information. excess of strocniral coverage is still shown at 1.6%. The garage side setback <br />has been improved now proposed at 7.5'. originally at 5'. By moving the garage tunher west, <br />the street setback of the garage addition was proposed at 10' and is now shown at 9 <br />in the 75-250' setback area has been adjusted to include the overhang along the east side of the <br />residence. Remember haidcover would only include P/i' of the overhang area (overhang at 3 <br />width). <br />The top of the bluff is now defined at the 956 ’ elevation. Note even the garage addition <br />as it is moved southward on the property falls within the required 30’ setback area. Review the <br />setbacks to the top of bluff as presented above in the factual review intormation. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1 There is an excess of 1 structural coverage. The following improvements add <br />to the structural coverage: <br />Boathouse = 256 s.f. or 1.6% (existing) <br />Second floor deck = 200 s.f. or 1.2% <br />Other reduction in either garage or principal structure additions. <br />2 Excesses of hardcover exist on the property (refer to Exhibits D-3, E-1 and E-3). <br />Note all landscape areas underlain with plastic will be removed but applicant has <br />not removed the additional access stairs as requested by Planning Commission. <br />Refer to Exhibits E-1 and E-3: <br />75-250 ’ setback area: <br />Area 6 = 35 s.f. or .4% <br />Area 23 = 11 s.f. or .1% <br />0-75 ’ setback area; <br />Area 28 = 25 s.f. or .3% <br />Area 9 = 400 s.f. or 5.1% <br />Area 29 = 11 s.f. or .1% (wood deck) <br />Area 10 (wood deck) = 355 s.f. or 4.5% <br />Area 8 (boathouse) = 256 s.f. or 3.3% <br />Any there other improvements?