My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
05-23-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 3:58:22 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 3:54:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: 5/19/94 <br />ITEM NO.: jQ <br />\ <br />% <br />Ot, \ <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Michael A. Gaffron <br />Title Asst. Planning & Zoning Adm. <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />% <br />Item Description: #1925 Peter Bovec, 840 Old Long Lake Road - Variances - Resolution <br />Application: Request for front and side setback variances to raise the pitch of the existing roof, <br />and a side setback variance for reconstruction of pre-existing deck as a bedroom enlargement <br />of 5 ’xl4’. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Resolution <br />B - Notice of Planning Commission Action 5/20/94 <br />C - 1994 5-.VC; <br />Cl-1976 Survey <br />D - Permit Record <br />E - 1976 Addition Plans and Elevation <br />F - Memo and Exhibits of 5/10/94 <br />Pertinent Facts <br />Per new survey (5/19/94) house is 15.1’ from side lot line (15.6’ on old survey. <br />30’ required). <br />Per new survey, house is 35 ’ from front lot line (34 on road survey, 50 <br />required). <br />Summary <br />Applicant proposes to change the pitch of the roof from 3.5/12 to 8/12. This increase of the <br />building envelope within the substandard front and side setbacks technically requires setback <br />variances. Additionally it has been determined that a removed deck proposed to be replaced as <br />a bedroom enlargement encroaches 1’ into the side setback also requiring a variance. <br />Planning Commission Review <br />Planning Commission recommended 6-0 to approve raising the pitch of the roof over the existing <br />structure. However, a question was raised since the 1976 survey showing "proposed addition <br />did not exactly match the existing footprint of the residence, i.e. a comer of the house shown <br />on the survey was not in existence currently.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.