05-09-1994 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1912 April 14, 1994 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Applrcation B - Property Owners’ List C - Plat Map D - Hardship Sutenant E - North/West Elevations - Roof Plan F - South/Easi Elevations - First Floor Plan G - Second Floor Plan and Deck H - Survey I - Engineer ’s Rept»t 4/13/94 Descriptioa of Reque^ Applicant proposes a two-story addition to the cast and north ot the exiting residence Aat will be two times as large as the existing 752.4 footprint of the existing house. The addition includes a two-level garage at rear or east side of residence. Applicant wishes to extend addition along existing front and side of residence requiring setback variances. Review Exhibit D. applicant's hardship statement. The property is now served with sewer connected in May of 1993. Applicant provided City with an easement to extend sewer along north lot line of property to sers'c properties to the east of residence. The width ot the eaicment is not shown on the updated survey nor the exact location of the culvert that drams beneath the driveway at the north side of property and eventually to pond to northwest. The neighbor to the immediate nonh has voiced concern with additional drainage from new construction increasing runoff and storage of drainage on his already severely limited property. Staff has completed a siie inspection with the City Engineer. He notes that the majority of drainage from this structure can be directed to the culvert at the southwest corner of property that drains under Leaf along the north side of Bayside and eventually to Stubbs Bay. All downspouts will be directed to ite southwest drainage ditch Review Exhibit F. Note that the driveway shall be raised and allow drainage to flow to the south. It is not clear from the preliminaiy information received whether applicant plans to install a new foundation. If this is the case, this would be the opportunity to relocate house at a conforming setback. If there is to be further expansion of the second floor above the existing residence, the City will require confirmation that the existing foundation can support the expansion. Applicant should provide Planning Commission with more detail as to the amount of filling and cutting to be done. Review Exhibit E, the north elevation shows cutting into the bank at the northeast corner providing a lower access door to the north yard from the lower level garage. To date we have not received to-scale drawings of elevations so it is difficult to coi^irm the exact height of the addition but it does not appear that there will be problems with the height.