My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
05-09-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 3:37:49 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 3:32:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
522
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1881 <br />April 15, 1994 <br />Page 3 <br />• Methods to minimt7.e soil erosion and to trap sediments before they reach any <br />surface water feature must be used. <br />• Altered areas must be stabilized to acceptable erosion control standards. <br />• Fill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an ’instable <br />slope. <br />• Plans to place fill or excavated material on steep slopes must be reviewed by the <br />City Engineer for continued slope stability and must not create finished slopes of <br />30% or greater. (30% is approximately a 3:1 slope). <br />• Fill or excavated material must not be placed in bluff impact zones (not a factor <br />here). <br />• Any alterations below the OHW of public waters must be authorized by the DNR <br />(DNR has confirmed no permit required). <br />• Alterations of topography must only be allowed if they are accessory to permitted <br />or conditional uses and do not adversely affect adjacent or nearby property. <br />It appears that with the revision of slopes to 3:1 at the crossing point, these standards and <br />conditions can be met. Staff would anticipate that in order to construct 3:1 slopes, the crossing <br />may have to shift 5-10 ’ westward to avoid filling into the neighboring property to the east. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit and variance for crossing the <br />creek A suggested hardship for the variance request is that the rear of applicants’ property <br />cannot be suitably maintained and he has litUe use of that property without access to it. <br />Conditions of approval should include: <br />1 Applicant to obtain a land alteration permit from the City prior to commencing <br />construction. <br />2. Construction on the driveway and crossing may not commence until the <br />Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has issued a permit. <br />3 Plan must be revised to include 3:1 finished slopes rather than 2:1 slopes. <br />4. Appropriate erosion control and site protection measures (i.e. "Best Management <br />Practices") shall be maintained during all phases of construction.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.