Laserfiche WebLink
“ >r,TK,> /-riMMTTTFP meeting of FEBRUARY 16, 1983MINUTES OF THE MARINA COMMITTLL <br />MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS <br />page 2 <br />,-u .,«or iDDlv for a conditional use permit. <br />Mabulth reported that Maciosek has owned the <br />property since 1978 and has continued to improve <br />the site. The City has received no complaints <br />concerning its use. <br />is: fp”doi ^^rs^S‘o^%^:Sv:sSs^"e:fs? <br />ISvel o£ use. A slip would be available £or each <br />o£ the rental units. Mabusth advised that in the <br />ibsense of a survey, it was impossible to <br />SeSSSmine i£ there was su££icient dock use area <br />Vo permit the seven slip use. Sta££ t=viewed the <br />nlat nap of the immediate neighborhood noting <br />ShSt i£ She side property lines o£ the neighbor to <br />:Se northwest were extended that it severly <br />limits the "Resorts" dock use area. Mabusth <br />noted that this is a new application and that the <br />L M C.D. would have to apply the formula of 1 boat <br />per*5h' of shoreline. The subject property has <br />laS' of shoreline limiting the density level to 4 <br />slips. <br />Grabek questioned the real need for a survey <br />since Maciosek had reconciled the encroachment <br />problem on the south side of the property two <br />seasons ago and that unless the neigl-jboring <br />oroperty owners were still complaining , the City <br />should be able to make a recommendation without a <br />survey. Frahm questioned to <br />City would be held legally responsible if there <br />was an accident and the City approved the license <br />without some type of approval from the neighbors. <br />The docks are far removed from the heavii <br />trafficked area of the lake and the area is <br />limited to local boat users. Frahm moved to <br />table action on the licnese application subject <br />to the applicant obtaining letters from the two <br />adjacent property owners noting approve o <br />proposed 2 dock, 7 slip layout. If the applicant <br />is unable to obtain the necessary letters then <br />survey of the shoreline and dock use area wi e <br />required prior to any action of the <br />Committee. Goetten seconded. Voce: Ayes <br />(3), Nays (0). <br />"HL?n”a C^mut^e "mt ur, <br />that once again the application involves no <br />changes from last years level of use nor in <br />dock layout. Frahm moved to recommend <br />of a 1983 commercial dock license <br />Minnetonka Boat Works. Grabek seconded. <br />Vote: Ayes (3), Nays (0). <br />H