Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1917 <br />April 13, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />the addition of another bedroom (total 6 bedroom). Review Exhibits G 1 and 2, the septic <br />system w'as designed for at a seven bedroom capacity . The total six bedrooms would once again <br />have no impact on the existing septic treatment area designed for a seven bedrcK>m use level. <br />Jim Jensen, applicants ’ contractor, has advised that a kitchenette was never installed within the <br />proposed guest apartment. There is a sink and a microwave oven. <br />The building staff has lulvised that a separate alarm system has been installed withm the upper <br />level of tlw garaee addition and that because of ’ mitations or location of the original gas line <br />installed to serveW principal structure, a new gas senice has been provided to the apartment. <br />Electric is still under one connection and as required by code there will be no assignment of a <br />separate address for the apartment area. <br />There is a gravel parkins area located within the street yard of the propeny. This area is not <br />shown on the survey nor was it approved by either the County or the City and was assumed to <br />be a temporary parking area at the time of the construction of the residence by both the County <br />and the City. Section 10.61, Subd. 5(A) would prohibit parking within a required front yard <br />as follows* . . . open parking spaces on lots must have a location other than a required yard <br />area except that such parking may be located in a rear yard to within 10 ’ of an interior side lot <br />line and to within 10 ’ of a rear lot line. Parking area is located within the 50 ’ froni/street yard <br />area. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1 Primary access to residence apartment is not within principal structure. Access to <br />principal structure is via a connected First level hallway that eventually leads to original <br />garage. Review west elevation Exhibit H. roof design of the structure would be <br />destroyed if a physical connecting corridor was installed at second floor. Note bedroom <br />immediately adjacent in the principal structure portion. Second story access is not <br />feasible. Should grade level entry way be relocated more within interior ot existing <br />principal residence? Applicants ’ contractor should be asked to respond. <br />2 The code specifically states that utilities shall not be separately metered from principal <br />structure. Applicants ’ contractor should advise if separate gas installation wUl be <br />metered independently from principal residence. <br />3 Code does not limit the number of non-rental apartments within a principal structure. <br />Is it necessary to make any physical changes to the former guest apartment within lower <br />leveP Unless there is another bedroom not accounted for in our current information, can <br />the guest area remain as originally proposed? A guest aparttnem has less intense use <br />than a full time caretaker apartment and certainly less of an impact on drainfield. <br />Any condition of approval must include the condition that gravel parking area within front/street