My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
04-25-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 3:03:16 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 3:01:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINXITES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />ilELD APRIL IL 1994 <br />(♦#5) #1898 PAUL & ROSE HAUSER. 2801 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 3408 <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution No, 3408 approving <br />#1898 Variances for Paul and Rose Hauser and 2801 Casco Point Road. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#6) #1901 TAMDEM PROPERTIES, 2645/3025 WATERTOW^N ROAD - <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />Mabusth reviewed the preliminary subdivision proposal and noted that the issues to be <br />determined by the Council were relative to the Park Dedication Fee and the areas which <br />would be credited against the park dedication fee, including the cost ot construction of the <br />Old Crystal Bay Road bike trail. She noted that the developer has agreed to construct the <br />interior bike trails. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the method of establishing the value of the property which is the <br />means by which the calculations are made for the park dedication fee. Jabbour stated he was <br />willing to reimburse the developer for the cost of the bike paths which were part of the <br />City ’s plan but any additional trails which were being constructed internally would be at his <br />own expense. Mayor Callahan stated he felt the internal trails should be public trails; Hurr <br />concurred, and stated the access to the trails should also be public. However, the internal <br />trails were an amenity to the development and she felt the developer should not be <br />reimbursed for those construction costs. She noted that the old barn and house on the lot <br />proposed as a park should be removed, and she wanted to have the costs of the trail <br />established prior to it’s construction to avoid any hidden costs. <br />Kelly stated he did not feel the interior trails should be deducted from the park dedication <br />fees; Goetten concurred. Hurr stated she would like to sec the interior trails instolled even <br />though the developer would not receive park dedication credit for their construction. Dick <br />Putnam stated they would construct them anyway. <br />Hurr stated she felt there was value in having the trail constructed prior to the homesites <br />being sold because people would not complain about an existing trail. Jabbour commented <br />he wanted the trail constructed to Hennepin County standards. <br />Dick Flint, Park Commission Chair, reviewed the potential costs of the trail construction and <br />noted that it was going to be more expensive because of it’s location. He noted that if the <br />Council determined park dedication credit was to be given for the trail construction it should <br />be based on the straight trail cost, rather than the proposed meandering trail location cost. <br />He stated that the Park Commission had considered how to handle the issue of trails that are <br />constructed along transportation routes and the Park Commission liked this and recommended <br />that the developer construct and pay for it for that reason. He noted that Hennepin Parks <br />would give the City credit for part of it and will help with the costs of construction for the <br />entire segment. He believed the costs would be approximately $30/foot based on Hennepin <br />County figures. <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.