My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
04-25-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 3:03:16 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 3:01:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />held APRIL 11, 1994 <br />(#4) #1885 LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. - 2675 SIXTH <br />AVENUE - PRD/SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW <br />Mabusth gave the staff report and requested Council direction to staff and the applicants <br />regarding the issue of density. Staff supports the use of the PUD zoning designation for the <br />development of this property because of the many wetlands and their placement throughout <br />the property. She noted that the project is located within the MUSA boundary but sewer is <br />not immediately available to the site. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the requirements for a Planned Unit Development zoning <br />designation for properties both with and without sewer availability. Mabusth noted that in <br />this case the availability of sewer made all the acres count towards the overall density tor <br />the project. Jabbour commented he felt the two acre lot size should be retained because that <br />was how the City of Orono was developed, and not just because there was sewer available to <br />the property. Kelley concurred, and noted he felt that two acre lots would be compatible <br />with the surrounding area. Hurr commented she had some difficulty requiring two acre <br />homesites in a sewered zone, but felt that the project should be developed as a PUD. <br />Gociten commented she would prefer to see a lower density for the project. Mayor Callahan <br />commented he observed the consensus of the Council was they preferred a 2 acre zoning but <br />there was the possibility of something less than that because of the possible PUD zoning <br />designation. He felt the Planning Commission should review the proposal and consider <br />whether they felt the PUD zoning desigm.tion was appropriate. <br />John Uban, Shardlow, Dahlgren and Uban. representing the developer, inquired what the <br />opinion of the Council was regarding the density. He noted they have added open space to <br />the plans which will benefit the community, and they believe the proposed density of 44 units <br />will be a good development plan. <br />Mayor Callahan stated that if the Planning Commission recommends changing the zoning to <br />PUD then the City will be required to hold a public hearing and have the zoning amendment <br />approved by the Metropolitan Council. Kelley commented he felt there should be no more <br />than 29 building sites in the development, and Jabbour concurred. Mayor Callahan <br />commented it appeared the Council preferred the current zoning designation, Uban stated <br />they would present their project to the Planning Commission for their review and <br />recommendation. <br />It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to have the Planning Commission <br />review #1885 Lundgren Brothers Construction, Inc. PRD/Subuivision located at 2675 Sixth <br />Avenue. Ayes 5, nays 0.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.