Laserfiche WebLink
Orono Property P.U.D. Submittal 5 Sovember 1993 <br />The land to the south Is guided for multiple residential and will be separated by a series of <br />preserved and enhanced wetlands and increased setbacks for homes. To the west is a future <br />elementary school site and other planned recreational facilities. These have not yet been built <br />but will form a typical edge to a residential neighborhood. <br />The wetlands are combined in large, commonly-held open space lots that provide both upland <br />and newly enhanced wedands for overall natural habitat suitable for wildlife nesting. <br />Additionally, the few lots that are located in the wooded, southwest comer are extra wide and <br />accessed by a private drive to minimize the impact on the existing woods. Clustering the <br />single-family homes and preserving expanses of wetlands with furtho* mhancement through <br />the storm ponding system and peripheral buffering are important elements of the PUD concept <br />which creates a neighborhood that b folly complimentary to adjacent land uses anl to the <br />goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />F. Comprehensive Plan Acccotabilitv <br />1. Land Use Guide Plan/Densitv <br />The subject property b currently guided for 2 acre single family. Thb designation b <br />also for all the adjacent area (120 ac.) surrounding the property, including the school <br />and old church property to the west. Lundgren Bros, proposes 58 residential single <br />family lots on approximately 58.6 acres for a gross density of approximately 1.0 <br />dwelling units/acre. <br />2. Site Utility Availability and Service <br />Sanitary Sewer and Water Service <br />The subject site has a problem with a high water table. The onsite septic system <br />ordinance of the City of Orono recognizes the problems with onsite septic systems <br />when the water uble is less than 5 feet below the surface. Also, by requiring dual <br />septic sites makes the likelihood of an acceptable onsite system for housing on the <br />subject property very unfeasible. The economics of development when contemplating <br />city services require that the cost be reasonably spread over each lot created. With an <br />overall density of one unit per acre, these costs can be reasonably shared by all the <br />lots created. A project that b less dense but with the same utility costs would not be <br />feasible. <br />Since the site is in the MUSA l*me and the City’s comprehensive plan contempl^es <br />City sewer for this area, it is only reasonable to approach the project by clustering the <br />density into a pattern that can be economically served by extending utilities to the <br />area. The quality of the water that eventually drains to Lake Minnetonka will be <br />enhanced. By having centralized City sewer and the extensive wetland and ponding <br />system on the site, water quality should exceed what is running off of the property <br />t^ay under it^ agricultural use.