My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
03-28-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 1:54:09 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 1:52:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />March 25, 1994 <br />SUBJECT: Tandem Properties (Dkkey Property)/Bike Trail Update <br />Several years ago the City developed a trail system plan to identify the future location of <br />bike/hike trails in the community. This plan did not determine a time line, priorities, or funding <br />sources for the trail system. The Tandem Properties development proposal includes a bike trail <br />along tlK portion of the property that is on Uk City ’s trail system. <br />Prior to the Tandem Properties proposal, the City had considered a joint project with Hennepin <br />Parks for a trail on Old Crystal Bay Road between the Luce Line and Baker Park. The Council <br />tabled action on the project to enable staff to find ways to reduce the costs of the trail and to <br />address concerns of the neighbors. <br />Some of the costs of the trail have been reduced by moving the trail off the right-of-way to <br />eliminate the n^ed for curb and gutter at some points. Additional cost reductions will result <br />from a portion of the trail being developed as part of the Tandem Properties development. One <br />cost reduction will be the elimination of the n^ for the City to provide landscaping along this <br />portion of the trail. Also, when the Park Commission recommended that a trail be constructed <br />by the developer, the developer agreed but indicated the costs of the trail should be deducted <br />from the park dedication fee. The Council does have tlw option of reouiring the developer to <br />build a trail without a reduction in L’.e park dedication fee. 1 have attached the memo previously <br />provided to the Council that outlines this issue. <br />Additional opportunities for cost reductions could be achieved by phasing the trail over a several <br />year period so that some portions are constructed at the time the adjacent property is subdivided. <br />This would enable the City to obtain easements to construct the trail adjacent to the right-of-way <br />to avoid some curb and gutter costs. It also eliminates the need for the City to install <br />landscaping along these areas. <br />The phasing alternative is workable within the Hennepin Parks joint funding arrangement. <br />Hennepin Parks has indicated they will agree to provide joint funding if the City makes a <br />commitment within the next five years that a trail will be constructed between the Luce Line and <br />Baker Park. The City Engineer is in the process of recalculating the costs of the Old Crystal <br />Bay Road trail project based on a phased approach. <br />The two neighbors with significant concerns regarding the trail are the Hiles and the <br />Brandenbergs. In addition to general opposition to the trail by each, the Hiles have concerns <br />regarding landscaping, drainage, a retaining wall and a fence. The City Engineer is preparing <br />additional information and alternatives to address each of these concerns in preparation for a <br />meeting with the Hiles.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.