My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-14-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
03-14-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 1:27:51 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 1:23:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
465
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Request for Council Action continued <br />page 5 of 10 <br />Mar*h 11, 1994 <br />Zoning File #1901 <br />Ellen Sones of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed has advised that the current mitigation plan <br />presented in your preliminary plans. Exhibit Z. have been conceptually approved by the staff <br />of the Watershed District. She has called for the publication of the permit in the Environmental <br />Quality Board Bulletin. After the 30 day period, which she advises would end some lime at the <br />end of April, the application can then be brought to the Minixhaha Creek Watershed Board for <br />their regular monthly meeting in May to review both the final mitigation plan and stormwater <br />treatment/control plan. The earliest possible permit approval from the Watershed District will <br />probably be in the latter part ot May of this year. Staft has asked Ellen Sones to send a letter <br />to the developer advising them of the current review schedule. <br />Representatives of the DNR Trails asked the City not to act on the preliminary plans at the <br />January meeting of the Planning Commission pending resolve of certain downstream drainage <br />concerns, adequacy of culverts under Luce Line and the impact of increased runoff from <br />development on ponding areas adjacent to Luce Line. The DNR met with the applicant and staff <br />and have approved the drainage plans as amended and have agreed to allow culvert replacement <br />and alteration of the trail to make the stormwater controls work (review Exhibit R). <br />Review Exhibits Ql-3, topographic maps of the Luce Line area, southeast culvert (18" at the <br />Coffin property) will be replaced. The DNR has agreed to allow the trail to be lowered <br />approximately 1’ allowing for an emergency overflow to assure residence on north side of Luce <br />Line will not be flooded. The DNR has asked that direct drainage to ditch along north side of <br />Luce Line on Coffin property be minimized as much as possible because of the inability to <br />widen and deepen ditches because of the steep elevations adjacent to trail. The DNR has been <br />convinced that we are dealing with a very small watershed. Drainage currently exits the <br />property at 18 CFS and will be reduced to 5 CFS. Throe retention ponds have been developed <br />on the Coffin property. The culvert at the north side of the Luce Line will be reduced to 12" <br />and exit on the south side at 18". This again is another attempt to reduce flow. The City <br />Engineer and applicant’s engineer have worked closely on the downstream drainage concerns <br />of neighbors and Planning Commission, specifically drainage as it leaves the Coffin property <br />running along the west side of the road until it exits via culvert to the east to the White Oak <br />Circle neighborhood (review Exhibits V and W). Shawn Gustafson reaffirms that the new <br />drainage controls on the Coffin site will not magnify drainage problems on Dougan property. <br />It may in fact slightly improve. Mr. Gustafson will be available for Council ’s questions at your <br />March 14th meeting. <br />The DNR seems to be less concerned with the detention pond in the southwest comer of the <br />Dickey property. Runoff currently exits property at about 117 CFS and after development will <br />exit at W CFS. Drainage will flow along via an existing drainage path to the southwest and <br />eventually to the 36" 75’ long culvert beneath Luce Line, No changes are proposed in this <br />drainage.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.