Laserfiche WebLink
%i%I .*•, - ■*4t <br />4 . <br />f, / • <br />\ <br />t <br />) , <br />,1^ . <br />• # <br />r <br />i <br />I <br />• 1 « <br />•i <br />t <br />•j <br />i <br />•• I <br />1 <br />Zoning File #1280 <br />Page 3 <br />10. Staff would suggest that this property certainly has <br />sone unique circumstances and hardships# given that it is <br />sandwiched between two shorelines. This situation occurs <br />along Baldur Park and along Fagerness Point Road# both areas <br />in which a number of variances have been granted in recent <br />years. Attached as Exhibit J is a listing of the variances <br />that have been granted in recent years in these two <br />similarly situated and similarly zoned areas. Although <br />hardships and unique circumstances will vary from <br />application to application# the information presented should <br />provide Planning Commission with some sense of the degree or <br />magnitude of variances that have been consistently approved. <br />11. A summary of the necessary variances is as follows: <br />a. 0-75' hardcover. <br />b. 75-250' hardcover, <br />c. Additional structure in 0-75* zone# including the <br />concomitant grading and excavation associated with such <br />construction. <br />d. 5' structure-to-structure setback variance. <br />Additional Items of Concern - The property owners directly <br />adjacent to the property# the Keesling's# have submitted a letter <br />supporting the application# stating that their views will not be <br />hindered and that the addition would be a beneficial wind block <br />for their house. Note that the Keesling roof drainage may tend <br />to flow somewhat across the applicants yard area. If the <br />additions were constructed# staff would recommend that the <br />drainage be allowed to flow to the southwest onto the flat area <br />of applicants's property to enhance infiltration. <br />Note also that at applicant's property# the City no longer <br />maintains Baldur Park Road# and it serves merely as a driveway <br />serving applicant and the residents at the tip of Baldur Park <br />Point. It would appear with the proposed driveway plan that <br />applicant could park two cars in the garage and two more cars on <br />the driveway apron within the property boundaries# without <br />affecting that continuing driveway. Staff would express the <br />concern however that, if the property at the end of Baldur Park <br />Road is developed at some point in the future# the City may <br />require that a private road outlot be dedicated# with the <br />potential that public road dedication be required. While this <br />has not been discussed at any great length recently, a past <br />application to divide the point into three total lots had <br />received preliminary approval# with a cul-de-sac directly <br />adjacent to the applicant's driveway (see Exhibit K). Based on <br />that preliminary approval# applicant's proposed deck would end up <br />10' from the edge of the cul-de-sac dedicated for Baldur Park <br />Road# and a portion of applicant's property would be dedicated <br />for Baldur Park Road. <br />I . <br />i • <br />mkfm <br />Sfv <br />U <br />• <br />i <br />'1 <br />•4 <br />ii <br />• • <br />I ‘ ' : <br />J