Laserfiche WebLink
> • <br />h- <br />I- i <br />t <br />i-1 <br />*;. <br />** <br />\ ‘ <br />*•► V <br />U- f ‘ <br />/) <br />,^’S PI |J / ^ ^ #V ^ . <br />Zoning File #1280^ <br />Page 2 <br />0-75* <br />75-250* <br />rt / I - <br />t • -o Cw « <br />) S ' ' <br />Existing <br />30.4% <br />49.0% <br />Proposed <br />30.0% <br />46.6% <br />->c <br />jc-J <br />V/'"| <br />4. Although the hardcover does show slight decreases in both <br />0-75* and 75-250* zones, the applicant*s intent is to <br />increase structural hardcover on the property by half again <br />as nuch as now exists. The structural increases are in <br />additional decks and in additional structure. The <br />structural hardcover changes are as follows: <br />0-75* (N) <br />75-250* <br />0-75* (S) <br />Existing <br />1,313 s.f. <br />637 s.f. <br />_ _ _ _ _ <br />1,950 s.f. <br />Proposed <br />“2,157 s.f. <br />709 s.f. <br />—0 s.f. <br />2,866 s.f. <br />i7 <br />Net Change -f916.s.f. <br />5. The proposed hardcover removals and additions are shown <br />on applicants diagrams which are listed as Exhibits G and H. <br />Note that the existing deck of width 9.4* will extend <br />approximately 1.5* closer to the lake, according to the <br />design plans. Also, because the existing second story deck <br />above the westerly room will become a living room, applicant <br />is proposing a deck expansion to the west. <br />6. Note that the additional room expansion, where there <br />currently is no structural hardcover, is between the house <br />and the garage, where it will have no significant visual <br />impact from the northerly lake, but will be quite visible <br />from the west. <br />7. Applicant is proposing a 5* separation between the new <br />construction and the existing garage, with the new addition <br />to be architecturally attached to the garage by a covered <br />walkway. From a zoning code standpoint, this would appear <br />to require a variance to the requirement of 10* separation <br />between buildings. From a fire safety standpoint, the <br />garage and the house can be constructed with the appropriate <br />fire walls so that building code standards can be met. <br />8. Note that the proposed additions will be constructed to <br />meet the side setback requirement of 10*. <br />9. The current structure jutting above the house does B>eet <br />the required 30* maximum height limitation. <br />i< I <br />- <br />•i <br />■■ <br />•A ■' <br />.i ' <br />j <br />l <br />0 <br />4(%i <br />\ <br />? * <br />f . <br />V <br />.V V <br />V • <br />' 1 <br />J