Laserfiche WebLink
'«g ■•taij■■■ -‘jflssjNr■ <* ■ng Administrator <br />Bohn's Point Road - <br />i of Accessory Structure <br />level 792 s.f., attic area 294 <br />»et Yard Setback <br />ping <br />■ upgrading of his resi'’^*'ce and <br />the existing accessory shed and <br />gle 22'x36' detached garage with <br />rage as the present residence <br />the wideningr lengthing, and <br />of the entrance drive. Please <br />. Staff had to back out of the <br />length of the City vehicle and <br />present garage. Applidant will <br />B adjacent to the entrance way, <br />ons cannot be connected with the <br />iw garage but it clearly falls <br />require a land alteration permit <br />bit G, note that site distance <br />lies and perennials along Bohn's <br />present 3-3%' height. <br />-Vi m <br />md <br />i;-v-: v--v -- <br />(A : - <br />-.,Ar i,i; J <br />V >:•■ <br />1 <br />f <br />iv>^mii <br />• V-: <br />tA-y, ■: A-; .V;;;: .y':v iM <br />% .’"i3 ;Vy^’mvmvm <br />f. :• •■■•' <br />lK»Si! <br />p;.a; <br />■■i=.fc* <br />..Vvvwy^\.r <br />• .* s- .Vy.A; -yy; A.-'f . . .' ' ■ '■■A -' * ‘■ •' ■. ■' y »'-T- • .*. *■••**.' • '•: • y ' •• . 'y y ■Hv; if:. v: ■ ■ ■V-.vv..f,.-;-^'^0 • j.- ■ <br />aa-:av.,a.:;g <br />Zoning File #1253 March 11, 1988 Page 2 of 3The applicant has asked you to consider a variance setback for theproposed garage citing the following hardships;1. Limited flat yard area and need to preserve that limited yard <br />area. <br />2. Interior design of structure and location of view windows would <br />prohibit the attaching of the garage on the east side of the house. <br />3. Location of mature maple tree within the northeast yard area. <br />Garage ?n^ its propoVed^ location'IfA 1^ lessen the impact on the adjacent <br />neighbor. <br />5. Moving the garage further north provides the much needed turn­ <br />around area between the house and garage. <br />6. There is no visual impact along the County Road because the <br />mature, dense screening that exists along the roadway and the garage <br />will be installed so as not to disturb the existing screening. <br />At the time of the filing of the application, the applicant we s not <br />aware that the accessory structure would also require an area variance, in <br />fec^nt applicat^^^^^^^^ il has been the City's policy to include not only <br />around floor area but to also include levels that are inhabitable or usabxv. <br />I 29 4 s!f. of attic space had to be added to the accessory <br />The applicant has advised that there is no storage area within the <br />principal structure and that the attic area was needed <br />storage*^ space. As applicant's addendum points out, the structure has been <br />designed to blend in with the existing residential surroundings. J^e 20 <br />high structure will be screened by the surrounding natural P® <br />the north boundary line. The proposed structure will he constructed of the <br />same exterior finish as the principal residence (redwood siding). <br />The City staff has received no comments from the neighbors notified <br />for this review. <br />above. Approval is subject to the following conditions. <br />1. Applicant is to obtain a land alteration permit for the regrading <br />of the drive and the placement of the retaining walls adjacent to the <br />drive. <br />2. Applicant must obtain a demolition permit prior to the removal of <br />the existing garage. <br />S <br />r-' <br />y-'.=y.vyyA' <br />■ ..A : <br />^ .. (■: • • <br />v.y <br />ir-'-' <br />'m <br />wm^yVrV-y'V: <br />i • ■■ <br />S:?a: <br />• • ; <br />Vrr‘:’* <br />iyvy <br />i'lWV-Vskf:mvvmv-yi <br />v'.--- s.■ <br />Aa:.- AA <br />;4iE'-y <br />............m <br />: y;.- :\yy• .-i:; v'L-. V.-; ^y.rr-i:=; <br />•■•fe:.A4y .yV-' <br />t - ' - <br />h