Laserfiche WebLink
F. ...mtructed at the following <br />and an approximate 35x28' <br />roposed. <br />.28, Subdivision 3 (A) - <br />ses. <br />f but has not received a <br />a permitted use with a <br />leets the requirements of <br />iting a conditional use <br />may want to provide day- <br />: application and would <br />Council for an expansion <br />Meets Required <br />Meets Required <br />110' <br />165' <br />145* <br />230 <br />Meets Required <br />Meets Required <br />Meets Required <br />Meets Required <br />lot line (Exhibit F) as <br />It will also have to be <br />rrier from the residential <br />1 approved by the Planning <br />•• V <br />'‘jiiISIBE:: <br />Zoning File #1254 March 11, 1988 Page 3 of 7 ■i■■‘•'.■Ki-'i:..,';■ -vVoH:-vi.fc7 : ' ■ o/. i[i-Drainage - Section 10.60, Subdivision 15The drainage has been reviewed by the City Engineer and Minnehaha <br />Creek Watershed District. <br />The M.W.C.C. has reviewed the project and since there is no change in <br />the direction of drainage and very little change in additional parking lot, <br />they will approve it with the following comments: <br />1. Soil erosion control will be maintained throughout the project <br />2. Any future construction of the parking lot to the west must be <br />submitted to M.W.C.C. for approval. <br />The City Engineer's comments are similar to those of the M.W.C.C. <br />Traffic Control/Access (Exhibit E) - Section 10.60, Subdivision 16 <br />Review of the two access points by the Hennepin County Department of <br />Transportation Department was looked upon favorably. The only comment was <br />that the east access must be lined up with North Brown Road (see Exhibit <br />L). <br />Traffic flow within the parking lots was reviewed by the City Engineer <br />(Exhibit J) with the following comments; <br />The extension of the parking lot to the north will require extensive <br />grading work. We recommend that a grading plan be submitted <br />indicating final contours for that area. <br />The drop off/turn around created by extending the sidewalk onto the <br />driving surface creates a driving hazard. We recommend it be revised <br />or eliminated. <br />The extension of the parking lot has been done with grading permits <br />from the City and the contours shown are final. <br />Signs - Section 10.60, Subdivision 1 <br />Existing sign is located over the lot line. There has been an attempt <br />to acquire more property in this area to no avail. This sign must be <br />relocated on the church property, 5' from the property line, and not exceed <br />8' in height above grade. <br />mmwmmm <br />4 <br />I-.,., <br />.' Hoi <br />■ r- ■ o -f V .. o- ■ <br />, . -■■■:,■ '.H.i. .. <br />44. <br />,V . r • <br />fi. • *. fr . ’. <br />ii <br />my' ;■ ^ <br />ii-.'. - . . r ■ : :-.V <br />... • . V <br />y\' ' <br />y'm-m 4- <br />:Y-y 77. X-y; A-V r.7^*swii <br />nmmy <br />■■ ' ■ j ■ y ^ • V.O •:: <br />yMiM