Laserfiche WebLink
iiif ill iiliilillitiiiiiiimMA V ,V.; ,■ .-/■■ ■•:'• ■" :•• ■.' ■./ ^■mm•* v-i :■ - v; <br />I be to assure that appropriate <br />luring the installation of the <br />Lne and other areas during the <br />rn sent to all neighbors of the <br />ift stations installed. We wish <br />roposed design of the structures <br />While disturbed areas will <br />>f the lift station upgrade will <br />, The only structure to remain <br />ity has no information as to the <br />to be used based on the current <br />to comment on this. <br />south of the existing Maxwell Bay <br />ht-of-way. The new installation <br />at grade for the valve vault and <br />inel above grade. <br />;o screen this from the marina <br />ithin the Hennepin County access <br />located withir County property <br />b11 and valve vault typical of <br />appears at grade level. Again <br />rfould be set at grade level, <br />ithin this site plan. Planning <br />sting lift station, abandoning a <br />ng it with a new valve vault and <br />be above grade. The hatches for <br />about six inches above existing <br />is also proposed because of the <br />yy^y jiiimla <br />ii <br />I <br />i , <br />te-A; <br />% <br />Immpi <br />VVA.^ <br />4 <br />u <br />N <br />rnmmm' I / •.S:V-V. <br />Mm <br />•;. . * r <br />m:^^‘yy’y^:-y-:* <br />y^yy::iyym <br />Sdfiing Pile #1254 March 15, IfBii Page 4 of 4 <br />[Lift Station Wo. 45 - Exhibits BE t CC <br />Wo major changes proposed, just upgrading of existing dry well and <br />vault, replacing sian>holes with the hatch tops. Portion of the valve vault <br />will remain at present height. Wet well will have the hatch at 4 above <br />existing grade the valve vault will remain at the present dry well height <br />which appears to be about 2-3* above existing grada. Per site plan, <br />landscaping appears to be proposed wittiio the adjacent area to lessen <br />impect of axisting lift atation. <br />The Minnehaha Crash Watershed District has just advisad that they have <br />tablad tha raview of the Metropolitan Waste Control Comaisaion's permit <br />application pending receipt of final eroeion control plana. In the City’s <br />recent review of County Woad 15 upgrading, the City conditioned approval on <br />«rc^iofi control plans prior to constructioiie We trculd suggest <br />that we do not delay action on thia application and Planning Commission **y <br />auggest that the application not be scheduled for Council action until <br />staff has reviewed the final erosion plans. <br />Staff would advise that we listen to any of the neighbors in <br />attendance that have any specific concerns regarding each of the individual <br />lift station locations and ask for any additions or amendments to the <br />proposed plan that sppssr rsssonsblse <br />Outside of the much needed erosion control during the process, staff <br />has no other concerns. If Planning Commission wishes any other items <br />reviewed or added to this review, please contact prior to the meeting. <br />Staff n:ecnmaarndstlcai - <br />To recommend the approval of the conditional use permits and variances <br />application of the Metropolitan Waste Control Comialsslon finding that all <br />standards of Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (D) have been satisfie^d and such <br />approval to include any amendment to any of the plans for each specific <br />lift station and to ask that the application be tabled until the City is in <br />receipt of the final erosion control plans for the project before <br />scheduling for Council action. <br />Y<<w*ip