My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-1988 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1988
>
03-21-1988 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2023 10:38:58 AM
Creation date
12/6/2023 11:56:37 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HBES 16, 1967ificate of Hailing <br />conditional use <br />that was damaged <br />wishes to repair <br />create a walkout <br />retaining wall at <br />:he slope and seed <br />0 includes a deck <br />iuse where no deck <br />es to reduce some <br />:ters and a sealed <br />ct transportation <br />hrough a pipe is <br />ophy that all roof <br />1 travel over and <br />ion purposes prior <br />ter and explained <br />tis proposal. He <br />>an to be used for <br />nprovements. He <br />eshore bank is a <br />be remedied and <br />I the slope is the <br />,er from Hennepin <br />ddresses the slope <br />the best solution. <br />1 can only have a <br />and welfare of the <br />n future pollution <br />if* and by adding a <br />proposal will only <br />of the property in <br />transportation of <br />d that runoff from <br />\ot be detrimental <br />uld use perforated <br />tives to applicant's <br />application in order <br />mm <br />um::. <br />•V <br />m- <br />mm <br />mrmms or 9%Kamvm coewssfoii i«mws wxm mmsma li, milun woi»i noted the drawback, of retaining wall endstabiUsetlon Vx*tenaive cost, are less <br />to •oft€n tb«r slop®* . w4«addressed the many issues outlii*^ in his letter <br />dated October 22. 1667 included in eteff s pecket. <br />. JV"Vo ‘iV.* t;i‘Vr«r.*» <br />conforunc* ®* («•! any connection »lth <br />t::irr-inr;hJ ‘««. *d*.«,T:nd tn. .'.c«..ity mr. <br />walkout. <br />john.on .olcd conc.tn .ith c^tfolUn, tho oto.lon <br />until the etorm damage ie repaired. <br />«p"or lopV but?“ .vS^y*d^n the slope which he intend, to replace. <br />st.ff .u„..t.d ““ •*bottom of tho elope et the lakeshore. <br />Cthy LOO. l»‘5 ^'AT.nror'op«« thSy oJlntd, <br />olnlX.r t,“?o"d ...’^cuttln, <br />Stn‘t*ho°Vl'o^r M . neighbor, thoy (oond the propoeel <br />less objectional than "cribbing . <br />included a walkout. <br />Brown noted th.t the City ‘VST.ry*ittt?i <br />grading Bnqineer'. recomoendation ve. thedifference in the Citi ^ n4«frict He <br />?“co»o.nd.tion ricoone^^^^^^^^ ofwould therefore agree with stair <br />denial . <br />H.n.on felt he would need to study the JSrther 't!L‘f«e oaring a r.cooncndation, and racoonended <br />tabling the application <br />There were no other comments from the public and the <br />public hearing was closed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.