Laserfiche WebLink
OVEMBER H, 1987if retaining wallnaive cost* are 1®** <br />naturally vegetated <br />the stabiliaatlon of <br />cm" event. <br />o require sowe grading <br />tlined in hie letter <br />staff*8 packet. <br />as an ordinance and <br />Ln the 0-75* lakeehore <br />ernativee within the <br />to solve the erosion <br />as any connection with <br />the neccessity for a <br />(trolling the erosion <br />I. <br />■■■■■■■ ■ Wt <br />ilaced hay bales at the <br />lave since been pushed <br />j replace. <br />E a silt fence at the <br />ore. <br />stated they had a <br />„ property they owned, <br />d effective was cutting <br />they found the proposal <br />Iternatives offered by <br />Conservation District <br />( not allowed alot of <br />and found very little <br />5 recommendation vs. the <br />jervation District. He <br />taff recommendation of <br />study the information <br />ndation, and recommended <br />Erom the public and the <br />Sifc..e.tutfR» or m Ftjynme cofoassxca Msmac bslo rortbiiisb i«, haumi CQirriwnIt was moved by Bellows, sec«Kl«d by Brown, to recommend denial of the proposed grading cuts to create a walkout <br />and recoivend that applicant submit a revised proposal <br />for grading in ordar to repair and eaintain his <br />lakeshore bank: and rectamnend approval of the Iskeshore <br />deck propoael near the house ss proposed conditioned <br />upon concurrent removal of tha 9'n 14* dack at tha edge <br />of the slope, resulting in s net incraasa of 37 s.f. of <br />0-75* hardcover - per staff recommendation. Motion, <br />Ayen 4, Mays 0, Abstention 1. Beaeon nbetelned. <br />• 1224 MIlOaTCnA BOAT H0KS8 <br />1449 SaOBBLIMB DUMB ______Amn-tn-rAcv oBBXTiowa o» pcbot /vabiabcbi <br />POBUC fpw^wrwg lQtBB-'lB<12 ... . — -The Affidavit of Publicatlcai and CertificstB ©f Mailing <br />were noted. <br />Byron Beimerk was present fix this matter. <br />Habusth explsined the sfter-ths-fact conditional use <br />permit/varisnce request for upgrading and expansion of <br />the boat lift St Minnetonka Boat Worke. The Orono <br />will servlc# 3 of thw lar^or bo^ts curironbly <br />stored at the Waysste facility. Council conceptually <br />approved the request at their November 9th meeting. <br />Bellows asked why the Orono facility oust atore the <br />larger boats at this point? <br />Byron Heimark explained that the Orono facility naeded <br />to replace their boat lift with a safer style which are <br />wider than the old style: and with the remodeling of the <br />Waysste ficillty, the-* can no longar stora the larger <br />boats and meet the perking requirements. <br />There wero no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing wee closed. <br />It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Johnson, to <br />rectMRmend approval per staff recommendation. Motion, <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />■In H;-