Laserfiche WebLink
•T'%VI ‘V vf, • <br />t. <br />mmrnmm:M::im iu^Vwa(ifcr.v":‘-n:;Vr lipfev-..d'"'''" <br />P'tSji <br />«:■■*■■ m <br />iA-' <br />fmmm <br />vv <br />m--^■M- <br />:.•-■-r >•■■ . -,:J <br />'i-|P^fP <br />-■i^-/.::P' <br />ri .i ; ■i:-v <br />fci <br />I <br />I"**Sfa <br />ffl teitte:" SaSSIssS« <br />'■■ Iu <br />K: <br />«a,:...: V: <br />LCi:^/i'i>!::-LOV..' <br />k 'ma.■i'^. ", La^:ifV ■■■■■■'■,>r. -•*v,v<^’.''' immmmang^a^ jaa^Mgfea: <br />$mm0^y-A <br />' '■ <br />Dates Piunnivig Ceu.*J^.s.s2ior4Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator April 13, 1980 - a■a.;:.-’: a; [K-: ::--IMIwvS ^ ------------^ .T>n rerald Neslund/James McCaffrey, 1225 Orono Oaks Drive -®"'’^“c'V.r.'A«\iSr« i ■‘evlsed Location <br />'i'5iai>kii-1 <br />:•■• ■ ^ <br />rmti:'- ■ ::■ <br />^ ♦• < r»na 1 Use Permit and variance to <br />The applicants were granted ® - wetland in order to access theirconst?Gct a driveway directly through a^wet 1^^^^ ^ <br />property on Crono Oaks disrupt the least amount of wetland, "^heir <br />a straight driveway that wo«16 indicated a driveway couldpreliminary engineering work hy McCo /Knut^^ fabric to -float <br />suitably be “A^nr which to be a shrubby swamp andthe driveway over the wetland, wnxcn <br />relatively stable. <br />"i?;3tv:r:iS '■> <br />: \ <br />rexa^xvcxj <br />». con.truotio„ «“ “‘"V‘?"’'i£2 <br />pond. It .pp«» <br />driveway in this vards of material that might have to beru2.'d*Vn .zTJx::ti .-..• <br />mm <br />f". -f <br />mi <br />I”’' •. <br />pxaiwevi ---------------— <br />The applicants are proposing to ® ** to^^its^nrevious^state, and <br />possible, allowing the wetland “J'Yn easement over Lot #8. This <br />relocate the ^®j.,_u_« elevation at the west end of the <br />proposed driveway location is ® ^ot V. There will need to be a <br />oV a"" d*ra1.nage%ay and the applicants note there is already a <br />culvert in piece# <br />'■Stii <br />CUXVt5iU *a* 4.4 n <br />*??h‘“e‘S.SlVnd^^*lh\’‘?l.'’o1.wn^o^"^^^^^ nn <br />SJtll nU’, due to the unique clrcuoetences. <br />easement «aaw-e* ------a------- rl4*V <br />The HcCefftey'e *°i2w^'^As’of*Sn 2rltlnV"we'heve not hoard <br />££lK7ro;' GVer«uS’'hl. -co';ilnlatlon on thl. matter. <br />MPl Staff Recomaiendatlon <br />m.: <br />:T,^mm <br />--T*-. <br />m:- <br />,. ■.•■;'■•'. .vv' •• •: ;• <br />V* * *-...;W-lj <br />Si* ''' i <br />Because the applicants would no' V^,“£[£ral™*cto?8es a narrow <br />" variance to construct a ^‘^£2 bemuse the Moposed driveway Is <br />dralnaqeway as Is as currently defined by <br />greater than ** J£? J wou*ld appear that formal approval of thedrainage easements on Lot 8, it wouio app There still remains the <br />££2.^'M"wVe\U^%"hVw?tpd‘easLent on ^ <br />k“t"o tVqu'.Vt ‘Vdd-rJirnt 1 r,:i;-n-^ eysejf;:n ‘ LoT., ?lnle th.r. Is no <br />Request for an improvement that benefits Lot 8. <br />rvi: <br />rm! SA <br />^•S," > <br />x:e4ucsov -------- <br />staff would recommend that y°™£”£££/22bject^to°whatover <br />for Council review at their meeting of April 25. <br />lii J « <br />I";Lm\-yyjA^ <br />V- <br />m ' %m <br />•A:;''. <br />mmk-i <br />mm <br />,Wk v .'-i <br />7-v.s <br />'.:::.:sh^r <br />• ^; :-.x ;■ ■, ^.. >f-0 - ' . mm«IA■ ' • <br />i} <br />k-':. <br />^ri-; <br />PJ <br />mmmym <br />s' ■*.;■ '1.' <br />'. HC %■:■' <br />m-' <br />m'm..1^- <br />I;■m <br />-i't ! <br />;-'-ymy::i <br />wm <br />st'i'a ;..'V >?■ ':•: tV''.j:'"- ; ■ ^-.my myrm ymm^-= '■■•' ,:yy^''‘mkmmmm. <br />myrnmirnSm- ^ <br />: A <br />*.•: <br />.r:; r , ■,.; <br />mmy •1- <br />K <br />ft" ■•. <br />/■ 'tA’t-y. ■ v,» <br />:ymf' /. t. • ‘ -2^ ^ ! •' '■yi^m^kyymkymmy -.cAyy <br />■m <br />m <br />i <br />;. A' ...'■ <br />m <br />•■*'t' <br />pyyr: <br />r <br />mmrnu