01-27-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

tight for Principalential zoneSf the 8 35' or 3 stories, i Coon Rapids' LDR-1 acre zones but with is 1/3 acre zoning standard is 35' for in their R-2 zone, a maximum building R-4, which allows allows for duplexs, ght of 3 stories or ollow the standard ling Code, it would standard may be ing Inspector, there >t Increase to a 35' safety. If we were ries, it is likely e able to reach the The 4 local fire » they feel will not standpoint that 2 of der trucks and 2 do a the maximum height r are not accessible tainlng the existing and continue the itions of building w r- i- -f' : -"V' mm iA- P • h.* ■'■■.vV-'fl ;.i :• V i ' .2'. ■ : . i?. . " ■«■• r mmmmm mm mmmMv' ■’kISSUS VIll. Tt^jographicai CoBsiderati«»s.There is a high potential that due to the hilly nature of Orono, an accessory structure might be located at a much higher elevation than the principal structure on that property. This is not necessarily a problem or a concern, however it should be reiterated that when we are discussing heights of structures and accessory structures, %#e are not talking about elevations above sea level, we are talking about height of individual structures based on the grade at the base of those structures. Staff does not feel at this point that the topographic elevation relationship between primary and accessory structures is worthy of discussion. 1S6UI II. Tennis Coarts, Pools and Other Similar accessory Structures. These "structures* pose unique concerns because they do not necessarily extend above grade to any degree and are not necessarily contained within an enclosed building. Staff feels that it may be appropriate to place a limit on the fence height around tennis courts, and given the accessory structure heights discussed elsewhere in this memo, such fences would certainly be limited to 18'.P0]^haps they should be limited to as low as 12'. The point is, in a 2-acre or a 5-acre zone, if a typical 7,200 s.f. tennis court is surrounded for its entire 120'x60' length with an opaque fence 12' high, doesn't that fence give it the same visual status as an actual building? Should it then be required to be setback more than 10' from neighboring property lines, perhaps as much as the principal structure setback? Is a 12' high fence 10' from the side lot line and 5' from the rear lot line considered not as objectionable as the 6' fence allowed upy^the lot line? This issue deserves additional discussion. ■to • ■ V'-. ■* . =•.\. -'v : • ■ V. • ■ ■ ' ■■ '• '.V ' ■ ■ .V • ..Si'' • v«-. mm : •• /■. ■ ; -i .--1 ■:afa