01-27-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.:: Jk.,sach 15 t.f. of floor area. B required following spaces should be !. 3unty Road 15. rking is down to 27 provided ch Is 33 spaces less than the lot Is snail which does The applicant has noved his Applicant also is proposing a f the parking problems. inated handicapped space. j (see Exhibit G): r each parking space, the east lot line and 10' off urb should be removed and the I, one for an entrance and the ave been reviewed by the City 3f Transportation and their d In width to one lane rather be moved 3' west when County V mmmjijrVSA-.P^:; - -"■•.•'SI ‘c"' i: ■■■•}: W- Sonlng file #1240 January 14. 19tt fage 5 of 7 : . ■ /■Hennepin County (see Exhibit, RI1. Is requesting the applicant to dedicate an additional 7 feet of right-of-way, making the right-of-wey 40 feet from the center of CSAH 15. 2. The location of the two curb cuts is acceptable. Appropriate permits must be obtained from the County. 3. All disturbed areas in the right-of-way must be restored. If 7' of additional right-of-»my is dedicated to the County, this will increase the front setback variance to 14* instead of the proposed 21 . The City has consistently denied the County's request for additional right- of-way along County Road 15. The County has confirmed that additional right-of-way is not needed for proposed upgrading of County Road 15. Accesses should clearly be defined with curbing and signs postedi •entrance" and "exit". Traffic Flow - revle«^ and addressed by the City Engineer with the Exhibit G): y -i" , Traffic flow was following comments ( 1. The menu board should be relocated. The proposed location mill result in some difficulty manuvering to get from the menu board to the pick-up window. 2. The driveway width should be limited to 28* to control traffic. The traffic flow sppe«.*s to be functional with the above corrections. Applicant is proposing to move accessory structure to provide a better flow. Landscaping - Plans were not submitted to the City as of this writing. The planii should be submitted prior to Council review of the application, and should address the following: . -A-. ;,<•••: ••• -:j /.'■ .* .• * *. • .. 1. All green areas should be shown - Vi.- 2. New and existing retaining walls should be shown - steep bank on northwest corner of lot must have retaining wall to protect new garage location. 3. Erect a 6' high fence or evergreen hedge not less than 501 opaque along the rear lot line abutting an R—District, -A;--::':-;;:. % ■ ' • s - .V . td' , :v-: -. ../ .v ■ . • ” ( Vi j . \rl ^mammsMai m»• •A A,?"* i