My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1989 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1989
>
11-20-1989 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2023 1:07:43 PM
Creation date
11/29/2023 1:38:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
313
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning Pile #1481 <br />November 17r 1989 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Also note that the "pre-existing contours” shown on the <br />proposed site plan, were taken after restoration grading occured. <br />It is staff's impression and the concurrence of the neighboring <br />property owner, Henry Sharp, that lakeshore grades except at the <br />vest end of the house, are very near the pre-existing situation. <br />Unfortunately, no grading plan with pre-existing contours (prior <br />to the remodeling) is on file. Obviously, applicant should have <br />submitted a grading plan for the proposed changes to accommodate <br />the basement doorway, and Orono's building permit application <br />requirements clearly state that any changes in grade must be <br />accompanied by a grading plan. <br />“'^her point to nota regarding 0-75' grading is that the <br />propoi. ows grade changes of approximately 0-6” between the <br />west y ^ f the house and the lake, and then creates a more <br />gentle slope adjacent to the southwest terrace area. If the <br />grading to accommodate the basement door is not allowed, the <br />extent of retaining walls and grading near the southwest terraced <br />area would be slightly revised. <br />Just as a matter of record, the applicant has paid the <br />required $400.00 after-the-fact land alteration conditional use <br />permit application fee rather than the standard $200.00 fee. <br />Staff BecosaMiidatloo - <br />Staff recommends approval of the grade changes within 20* of <br />the shoreline to accommodate the drainpipe through the rip rap. <br />This maintenance work would appear to be necessary to continue <br />the drainage system that was put in place with this subdivision <br />in 1975. <br />Regarding the lowering of the swale in order to accommodate <br />the basement access door, staff would note that the changes in <br />grade do not significantly change the drainage pattern nor do <br />they have any significant impact on quantity or quality of run <br />off. In the 0-75' zone, the swale is lowered approximately 6-12" <br />from its pre-existing status. <br />The more pertinent question is one of policy. The City has <br />in recent history denied cutting of lakeshore bank or grading in <br />the 0-75' zone merely to accommodate a walk-out situation. There <br />are a number of precedent cases within the last few years which <br />have been based on the concept that changes in the grade oT the <br />lakeshore 0-75' zone are detrimental from the standpoint of <br />visual impact as viewed from the lake, as well as changing the <br />character of the lakeshore. <br />In the McCourtney situation. Planning Commission should <br />determine whether the impact on the lakeshore yard is significant <br />or whether this situation is unique due to the pre-existing swale <br />and the relatively minor changes in grade proposed in the 0-75' <br />zone. <br />; i <br />tt <br />I <br />k
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.