My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1989 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1989
>
11-20-1989 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2023 1:07:43 PM
Creation date
11/29/2023 1:38:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
313
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I 1 <br />Zoning Fil« #1470 <br />November 14, 1989 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Applicant's plan shows 6 spaces. Applicant should confirm <br />if garage to northwest of property can be used for the parking of <br />an employee vehicle. If this is the case, the parking standard <br />can be met, although in light of the proposed level of use, staff <br />would recoessend that 6 stalls would be adequate. <br />Applicant has provided no information as to the hours of <br />operation, number of employees, anticipated date of opening <br />clinic to public and their pets. <br />No drainage or land alterations are proposed with this <br />application. Drainage continues to flow to the south and tC' the <br />east. The new use shall be limited to 100 s.f. of signage. No <br />sign can exceed 50 s.f. in area. <br />Lighting has not been addressed by applicant. Applicant <br />should advise if exterior lighting is proposed with new use. <br />Landscaping is a difficult issue for the front yard area of <br />the property as already the majority of the area is covered with <br />paving. Landscaping in the front yard may create vision <br />problems. The Planning Commission may wish to examine the site <br />in consideration of the potential expansion of the parking area <br />to the east and to the south for additional landscaping improve <br />ments. <br />Options of Action - <br />Denial - if application is to be denied, pleare refer to <br />necessary findings within Section 10.09, Subdivision 6 (A). <br />Approval “ if approved, findings can be based on the <br />following: <br />1. The proposed use meets the intent of the B-5 zoning <br />district. <br />2. More intense commercial uses of this substandard site <br />have existed on the property without any negative impact on <br />the adjacent properties.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.