09-18-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-■m i»' ‘ ,i .: ..'■ii^^i^pl^lBi,,,:..; .;S". ' V: , v ■.:; ^v' - V; j',..vvk;.,:- -r :-^,--::.y..: ^•;::.v:...:. ■ :.>f .4. ,. ,v : .\v: .:. ; -■ ,>::im • ./; .'. .•.••* •... ~'’z- •; *■ •• • . ■ -T*.-/3 JULY 17, 1989 ride It. He said he which would average J at there were several as wetland. He said o drain the arei. Mr. ining Coinnii^dion as to to convert that area 1 of the subdivision. er that the applicant lifficult to do a PRD area. She said that ! area for all of the cts, etc.) associated Lots. It is necessary drainfield sites and wo lid be possible to CO renants? Mabuath neficial to the City, leability of the lots bout having a house that providing access air. tile which would he could probably use sth presented several i. She informed Mr. le U.S. Army Corp. of at into wetlands. Mr. Carlson what he 8? Mr. Carlson said existirg house. He would fix it up. t he would like to see of the property. Mr. it an access no matter ted that they had no gh the wetlands. t would only need a a area in order to a conditional use linded the Planning would be gaining an jture through road. ■ i ; . mm mm:-:/- mm i.v'F ■ --y'- ^ i % ■'»: y: 4' ^ -'y,'.S, - ■ ym.m. mm V'. L -■ .i- ■.”r ... . . ^k-:-, ; - .••'v Hl;•y V.' V'i/- ■:.mm:':-V "-■m m I*-' . i-;-- ■ ■ '■ -.'I;: : :. •:> ; • • ;■ ■.•"-mm-: ■ tii V.;',; ;■.-■■ -V. • ■; im i f : 1^ Sisy- HP m 5 • ;::■•-ie. >*/- ■ ■■:.: V r ■ ■. •’.* *frj ;Myi ■■' ■ ■■■■■=.■ •V-.. -a*.- % ... • V-\ zonae piu «i428-BoaGiss comtiw Cohen said that such an issue was difficu City ’s policy to discouiage excavation for walkc this application «rould be precedent setting. Planning Coamiissioner Brown said he did no hardship to justify approval of the variance, bank could be restored without the need to walkout feature of the proposed home. Planning Commissioner Johnson said that h< restoration of the bank and the house being sc 75* setback line. However, ha disapproved of the 0-75' zone. He also felt that given the hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area could 25%. Planning Commissioner Moos also felt t excavation was excessive and could find no hards Mr. Burgess said that City staff had conformance was important. He said that he di how the Planning Commission could deny excav. lakeshore area without providing ar. adequate e why. In his op nion his proposal addressed concerns of the City. He believed his proposal % improvement from wha;. currently existed. Mr. Berg said that there was no legal basis hardship on the grounds that there was an a particular proposal. The* 3 were no further comments from the p this matter 2md the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Col: Planning Commissioner Moos, to recommend application due to the proposal interfering in t zone and no adequate hardship demonstrated to Ayes«5, Mays"0, Motion passed. (At this time, 9:15 p.m.. Planning Comn departed.) SKETCH PIAR RBVIEM #1427 AUUf CARLSOH, 3140 HATERTONN ROAD SQK)IVISI(» Mr. Alan Carlson was present for this sketch was Mr. Gary Peterson, his Developer. Building and Zoning Administrator Mabuath there was 41.6 acres of land that Mr. Carl subdivide. Mr. Carlson said that he purchased Dr. Pan 10 Mi■■ 7^.*. • : .: •*. Vfe";ta’.’i--•. ■ ■/ i'-x.' -sv • •■?.. ■ ■■Kip: i S ■’ ' V' Vi m MEg' y-iil' V : ' ^ : -y ''y - Wi mm. K;;t'mm ii . ■ : ■■■A mim ifc?--Hi ;m wmm :-y '#1 ’ ■ • -.V.- .- "• . •'■ !?-• •:• •• i ■■•■;■ i • •: Liyi.ijtf*-'! is m is%: 'Wh&mm i-rm