Laserfiche WebLink
m -,iSfc:•••vV•'^v^v .mu::r>i ■■■ •• i.'- ■ - ariII 4*«s <» TD Puniac c«S«is»io» xanao tm.t n, «•»,tth th.rcil."irhr,h””,rrna *p.r 1^. ./• • ”;*/.*li <br />isature trees grcjving in the are to drain the are ’^. Mr. <br />lTr\»on .7ked ’?o?*direct“on*fiom the Planning Comala.ion as to <br />the best way to develop the northern lots. <br />Ch.lr«n K.ll.y off.r.d • <br />into a coauBons area to serve the residents or tne »u«u <br />Be said that a PUD could be done. <br />. . ♦•h.ti Staff would prefer that the applicantHabusth replied that J difficult to do a PRD <br />not u.. a PUD/PKD. Sh* Sh, ..id th.t <br />With residence pads leas J* ^ all of the <br />such a pad size ^ ^Lennia^ courts, etc.) associatediaorovements (swieaiing pools. *.ennxs couit.p necessary <br />with the residence normally sites and <br />to maintain legal to <br />well locations. l®y Mabuath <br />rftfltirictL poois snd tsnnis courts i . fitv* <br />and that applicant should comment. <br />loc.t^.5*tlMrd "n‘’dV.***Bt Vou“ <br />«t7"ndt/‘rrr «r “y Jat h. could probably u.. <br />various resources to locate the drain tile. <br />„„r‘IS- ss:s;? <br />toJinVers''trriJiirany proposed encroachment into wetlands. <br />Planning rommiasioner Johnson asked Mr. <br />intended to do with the He <br />that it would be a shame to tear down the <br />ha would lika to .ell it to .omeone who would fix It up. <br />Planning Coaai..ion.r Johnaon said that ^ .’'n. ° Mr! <br />only 2 lot, ’d.v.lop«l In ”?«''%".rnr°ln a«r./no‘’L-.tt.; Carlson said that there would be a need tor an acce <br />how many lots were developed. <br />The Planning Commission ih-Si'**?** <br />objections to access being achieved throug e w <br />Chelrmen Kelley noted that t)>. <br />variance for encroachment added that a conditional use <br />develop this property. reLnded the Planning <br />permit “»“« ‘I*” ’Vu!7lVl.ion!“5on be g.lning sn <br />e:«/«ir.c=«. r':.d\"h^’t wo“ d serve .. . future through road.