Laserfiche WebLink
r- h■>^53«Sfe-:'v v::;i::^/ -I/=^'■St ; •:-;r • v:Zoning Pile #1437-IdstroB> August 14, 1989 Page Two of Twonoted this was the proposed future barn location, and had placed the driveway accordingly to serve both the barn and residence.7. Note also that only the barn is proposed to be <br />constructed at this time. The plans submitted show a potential, <br />future addition to the barn which will not be constructed at this <br />time, but which would require a future zoning application <br />the need for variances and a conditional use permit (the future <br />addition would be attached to the barn at the roof line, and <br />would consist of a garage and tack room that could potentially <br />function as a guest house). <br />®**®®5his**application is similiar in nature to the recent Brown <br />detached oarage request on North Stubbs Bay Road. Adequate <br />setbacks are provided so that the visual impact of this structure <br />will be minimal. Also note that under the current code, this <br />building would be exempt from the 1,000 s.f. <br />restrictions since it is a barn, and under the proposed Ordinance <br />would fall within the limitations on accessory structure size for <br />a lot of 10 acres in area. If and when the new ordinance is <br />approved by the Council, any future subdivision of the <br />applicant's property would, of course, be subject to that new <br />ordinance. <br />Staff lUii n—f ndnfIrm ** . «Staff recommends approval. Findings for a recommendation of <br />approval could include the following: <br />1. The proposed setbacks and existing vegetation tend to <br />make the visual impact of this structure minimal. <br />2. The hardship is that the existing house sits relatively <br />near the rear lot line. The long, narrow shape of the lot makes <br />it impossible to meet the required "public" horse barn setbacks <br />on nny other location in the lot. <br />c .f