Laserfiche WebLink
f k\- -y::'--^' -'i .'r. •:•' ••TOs Mayor Grabek and Council Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Ccnnmission Members City Administrator BernhardsonMichael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning AdminDATBt <br />SUBJs <br />August 14» 1989#1437 - John B. A. Idstrom, II, 2580 Fox Street <br />Variance-Public Hearing <br />Zoning District - <br />RR-lB, Single Family, Two Acre, Unsewered <br />Application - <br />Request for variance to Section 10.03, Subd. 9D, to allows <br />barn to be located nearer the front lot line than the principal <br />building on the property. <br />List of Exhibits - <br />Exhibit A - Application <br />Exhibit B - Plat Map <br />Exhibit C - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit D - Survey <br />Exhibit E - Site Plan <br />Exhibit F - Proposed Construction Plans <br />Pertinent Facts - .1. Applicant proposes to construct a horse barn with a <br />footprint area of 864 s.f. This lot, being approximately 10.1 <br />acres total (7.3 acres dry) was configured such that the existing <br />residence sits relatively near the rear lot line, hence the need <br />for a variance for an accessory structure between tht front lot <br />line and the principal residence. <br />2. The proposed horse barn will be 150' from the west lot <br />line, 186' from the street lot line, and approximately 215' from <br />the east lot line, meeting the required horse barn setbacks for a <br />private (or public) stable. <br />3. Existing vegetation will tend to screen this structure <br />both from neighboring properties and from the street <br />4. The principal structure setbacks of 50' on the front and <br />30' on the sides, are more than satisfied, hence this barn will <br />not appear as a front yard encroachment to the casual observer, <br />if visible at all. <br />5. The barn has a peak elevation of 22', with the cupola <br />extending another 4.5' above it. Both by definition and by <br />relative elevation, this barn meets all of the pertinent <br />height limitations for an accessory structure. <br />6. Note that when the property was divided, applicant had <br />■; i K <br />'Tii <br />mi <br />. - ■«. V-Zoning 1 August : Fage Tw<noted tl the dri’7.construi <br />future i <br />time, b <br />the nee <br />additic <br />would c <br />functlo: <br />DiSCQSS <br />Th <br />detachc <br />setback <br />will b< <br />bulldl <br />restric <br />would f <br />a lot ( <br />approv <br />applies <br />ordinan <br />^ , ■ •I' : .V : ’ <br />■u ■: r-'- •• <br />2. <br />near th <br />it impc <br />on any