Laserfiche WebLink
rmwmmmmr:..-i:^m ■rtAAi „em Testingtea are near the rear erected by construction bout 70' back from the <br />J-f and should have no <br />Slopes are virtually <br />\n.°f theinal house location, <br />his property. <br />dralnfield sites have <br />lot, adjacent to the <br />iaos sites both^aps the most critical <br />Leld sites are uphill <br />irrounded on two sides <br />hese sites must be <br />construction traffic. <br />" ® house can be“oo or more setback <br />urther recommend that <br />•ructed within 30* of <br />» contour lines shown <br />jive with elevations <br />drainfleld sites are <br />le property near Pox <br />ed north of the pond <br />I must be preserved, <br />the prooerty, <br />inleal standpoint, <br />IS 300-350* away from <br />ste dralnfield sites <br />.mary site would be <br />ilternate site would <br />1 in the wooded area <br />‘te dralnfield sites <br />snerally parallel <br />th lot line. These <br />totally in order to <br />%mm:;-mmmm <br />m .. V V .f M ri; <br />• • • •S'. • ■: <br />mm: <br />' v ■ ^ '■ -r' <br />^•4.. r . <br />If: <br />•7 <br />I? . r <br />m-m'- <br />wmfyr> <br />:>v; ■=•:;•: T'- : 'j <br />- h:iiM <br />u <br />Ur. <br />ri <br />r: . : ■:: <br />' . ^ ■ * • <br />t . <br />:-V\ V- <br />■■ i' <br />' / ■'.■■ \ <br />ir^-: ..m wm-lli:Wrl]irrr-:v». = --iL,Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testinq August 22, 1989 Page 3 of 4Lot 5, Block 2. Priiuary and alternate cites are located about a third of the way back into the lot off the road, just above the woods. While additional sites probably could be located in the woods, the sites leave a relatively small building envelope near the road. Again, the sites need to be snow fenced to keep construction traffic off of them. Both sites require mounds. <br />Lot 6, Block 2. Primary and alternate sites, both being <br />mound systems, are located near the north end of the <br />P^®P*J^by near the road. Again, topographic contours vary <br />slightly from those shown on the survey. Slopes range from <br />3-6%. These sites force the house location to be more <br />centrally located on the property. The sites need to be <br />snow fenced to avoid traffic during road construction. <br />Lot 7, Block 2. Both primary and alternate dralnfield sites <br />are located near the north end of this lot. Both sites <br />require mound systems. The sites allow for great <br />flexibility in house location. <br />Lot 1, Block 3. Primary and alternate dralnfield sites, <br />both being mound systems, have been located on the property. <br />House location would be relatively near the cul-de-sac. The <br />primary site somewhat limits the potential house locations. <br />Lot 2, Block 3. Primary and alternate dralnfield sites, <br />both being mounds, are located near the westerly corner of <br />this property. These sites definitely need to be fenced off <br />during road construction, since they are in a prime **short- cut" area. <br />Lot 3, Block 3. Both primary and alternate sites are <br />located at the extreme east end of the property, leaving <br />5^®at flexibility in house placement. These sites are not <br />likely to be disturbed during construction of roadways. <br />Lot 4, Block 3. The two dralnfield sites are centrally <br />located on the property, having some significant effect on <br />house placement. The site evaluator anticipated the <br />existing house would be removed, with a newer house placed <br />to the northeast corner of the lot. House placement will <br />have to take into account the dralnfield sites. Both sites <br />require a mound. <br />iLi:-