Laserfiche WebLink
.* ■■'■V^ ' [,I ■iminlstrator ling AdministratorSystem Testing-lot subdivision il survey of the sites has been <br />1 proposed lot t <br />sites have been <br />stem due to high <br />!%o6t. These two <br />ition basinr but <br />•asin. The sites <br />icing before any <br />es place in the <br />lites have been <br />table conditions <br />ith the proposed <br />sre should be no <br />drainfield area <br />way during road <br />nate drainfield <br />two sites are at <br />house site near <br />ear to be very <br />Lnfield sites are <br />of the property, <br />the house site <br />1 driveway would <br />drainfield sites, <br />irately reflected <br />totally enclose <br />oad construction <br />the road. Also, <br />) verify that the <br />Lnfield sites are <br />>es of 0-2%. Both <br />I probable house <br />lese sites appear <br />/'■' V t-* _■ _ .*■;X..-;v:•' •' : vC;. :x:v- >■....mmmh-v--:v■■ ••■■ ■•;■■, 1 • ■yjy-'Jyy-V- •■.■=•• ■:.iV.. y -^- :J: •y.-j :V. •■v;;‘;7== =••;mi ■• r. . 1-r -■. ^rPage 2 of 4 Septic System Testingproperty line, Vnd not likely tVb *^V® *^®®r^^'eae sites are locat-A^ affected by construction <br />IfferV^*^ portion of Luce Line T?ail°“^ V^'affect nor be affected by the trail ci have no <br />additional alt., „i,ht locatj^ on tw." Vop”|y <br />been lo^caTe^d^at Si"no^*h"*end ^of sites have <br />reoif®**^ road connection to Leaf st-r^ iot, adjacent to the <br />lot systems, and this is perhtnL ®^*®*J-Ot of this subdivis 1 rin j P®rnaps the most critical <br />from tile proposed house locatlor sites are uphill <br />by proposed road constJictioJ *««ounded on two sides <br />surrounded by snov These sites must Ha <br />The building envelope is laroe In®”^ traffic, <br />constructed leaving apD?oxlm?J-i c^^>*'®^ ® bouse can be <br />ixom the drainfield gi?.! ? ®^^ »ore setback <br />?.%U-o7V.a ”-ko^‘'d"aS- <br />?Sun ‘S*ln‘“?nTlSl|.™ - - <br />streiH^lC'^'’^® so«he«t Mrne*r™r*ha ‘'i^"“*“ a«^^®®b- The house site would k.» t ^ ^^® P*^°P®rty near Pox <br />area. The two drainfield sit«% ®!®^®^ ^he pond <br />hi^h® ^^®^ ®*^® ^be only two avall»hf ^®‘*< ^® P^’sserved,both requiring mounds ®^^bes on the prooertv <br />location of drainfield sv<«f-Ani ® technical standpoint! <br />the houae should not caul. a “y pro??eS,f* away from <br />p-re7ty “%*h “v"r*suitable for a trench-type system®^^® would be <br />cTt“S."io%r“^- lo«t\d*^‘„'\r\o%‘d‘e*dTrif <br />With ?h®" Th^os^^sites®are^"®^® ^^®^"^i®ld siteswith the proposed road and near I-Ka generally parallel <br />sites definitely need to Ha e north lot line. These <br />Pre.erv. them dJrin, road co„«\”ct "o”'’ <br />• ■ v-t ‘ ^ . '•;j <br />iMyyy