09-06-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MMj Administrator3020 Pox Street - 1 of Public Hearing 1 Notice Owners 13 6/19/89 : Map ) and Inspection igineering Plans Lots. Each lot now the 50 foot front t the required lot ate frontage along from the private tpt those approved >ck 2 has adequate road extension to Block 1 and Lot 1« jacent to the road the two acre dry *J * ■ • ■ • ' • ‘ • 'L . ■ V •• ••••Vi/ -^ my • • •-. : vi'V; •■ •Zoning File #1411 Septe^er 1# 1989 Page 2 of 9Roads/Patnre AccmssThe Interior plat road has been <"esigned as a through road. Outlot B will be developed connecting to Leaf Street. There shall be a stop sign at the intersection of Outlot C and Outlot B in order to discourage speeders that may use this road as a bypass. If Planning Commission feels it more appropriate Outlot B can be redesignated as a continuation of Outlot C and the cul- de-sac be redesignated as Outlot B. This will discourage any critics of the plat from assuming the City would have to grant a length variance for the plat road. Outlot A has been repositioned to north exiting now to a dry area and away from the wetlands to the south and east. Future access to the south of the major wetland on the east side of the property was (jiscouragcd bacausa it would b© too clos© to th© Fox Str©©t roadway. The roads have all been platted at the required 50 foot width with 100 foot diameter cul-de-sacs. Please review the road plans Exhibits Y. The road shall be designed per Urban Road profile 28 foot minimum paved width to the inside edges of the curbing. Curbs and gutters will be provided. The applicant will be responsible for selecting three road names one for the maj r thru road and two for the cul-de-sac roadways. Please refer to your earlier exhibits in your packet for your June meeting that showed the ownership patterns of the properties to the ®^st. Note also that the plat road has been moved 26 feet from the wetland along the east side of the property. wetlands/Matershed There are five basic watersheds to Exhibit W. Unfortunately we Planning Commission's review, availalbe at your meeting. Mr. present the drainage plans for members may have. that maUce up the property. Refer do not have a large size map for but a larger scaled copy will be Gronberg will also be present to the plat and answer any questions Watershed 1 as shown on your map in southwest corner of the property predominately drains to the west via an open drainage way thrcxi'jh the Stellow Addition and out to Stubbs at the 967 elevation along the south side of the pond inhibits drainage up to 967 elevation overflow drains to the culvert in the southwest corner and then eventually to Maxwell Bay. Drainage from the roadway based on the design and grade at tne curve of the road brings water to the southwest corner culvert also. I am told by property owner to the south that drainage design creates erosion problems on his property. Stars has asked Mr. Gronberg if the use of that culvert could be discontinued and what the impact would be on the drainage to the west. Mark Gronberg said that filling would be necessary to provide the re-channelization of the collection area now to the northern culvert. The request was feasible and could be considered. i'L: ' ■ W 'V j fe’g'-v 'gv;;V If ^ 4-' mm mm -r;v„i V. -q‘ ■ ■' X ^ i- ■. '--gyv/v : '''V' vg ^ 'A. ;g-.j -mmm. mm mm *v m M:: Piw9 m