Laserfiche WebLink
>NOUMnai.MIMICXPAI. I(NIS 1 k 2 PZU 1932 <br />the applicant*) ie <br />i within the City of <br />d aa follows: <br />hereinafter *the <br />City for a variance <br />vision 1 and 10.55 <br />le located partially <br />no structures are <br />t2. Subdivision 2 to <br />15.8% in the 0-75* <br />er is allowed and to <br />e 75-250* lakeshore <br />trdcover is noraally <br />le lakeshore setback <br />)ite. <br />y Council of Orono* <br />I file 8932 <br />I a building site is <br />ceshore Sesidential <br />this application on <br />al of the proposed <br />ingsi <br />north of the lagoon <br />Be the 125* lot width <br />ent. <br />temining the actual <br />tyi <br />V-*.; “V- <br />p <br />r. • j <br />'r ■ *. .;• • *>.<• ■ ■■■• ••• ...'■ fCITYOFORONOcity of ORONOnfSOtunON os TWiaTY councilNO. ________ <br />7. <br />??.building site, the 0-75* hardcover prop^eed is 2.9ft0 sguare feet or <br />^A*A^ 75-250* sme is 3»3I0 sguare feet or30.01. <br />C2) lased on also crediting the northerly portiooa of the <br />property for the hardcover calculations, 0-75* hardcover <br />!• 2,9i0 sguare feet or 10.51 and in the 75-250* is <br />3,310 sguare feet or 10.2%. *« <br />(3) based on calculating 0-75* and 75-190* free the <br />Ug^, only crediting the building site, and with <br />drainage all directed to the lagoon, 0-75* lagoon setback <br />bedcover is 14.9% (all existing driveway), in the 75- <br />190* lagoon setback is 34.4%, and in the lakeshore 0-50* setback IS 0%. <br />0) ^licant stould not be penalised for the eaiating driveway <br />^rdcrover in the lagoon 0-75* sone, and in fact his d^veway <br />propM^ nininrtes the additional driveway hardcover <br />B) The neighbors' reguest for the lakeshore setback and <br />*y*f*?* •*^***«*‘ variances to allow for the least disruptive <br />sightlines, to naintain unifomity, and the capability to <br />**'*^“*?* i®®* ot relatively flat lawn area,justify the granting of a variance to the lakeshore setback. <br />f) The uni^e characteristics of the property i.g. the <br />proposed building site separated froa the reetof «^e property <br />by a lagoon, constitute a valid hardship to the prepay. <br />ri!* f/V, considered this application includingtlia xxndin9s and racoaMndatlona of thm Plannina CoaMiaaioo# <br />etaff, coMo.-ita by the applicant and the <br />effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the coeeunity. ’ <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />^*y%ee.a<».dfc.^ 9.--*aUiw4 WLaS» ^ -V-%* » - -i'^ed»-e’wC’. so'. -* i 4 <br />ki-f- <br />:■ . ■ :: ;•• i - . . .• ..V : <br />V..;.