Laserfiche WebLink
t boundaries of the B 2,000'+ of cul-de-second draft Bsented to the City <br />Inal septic t<ssting <br />reviewing the <br />croaches the malor <br />•y would never bJ <br />or revision of lot <br />:eJda2cer**s?ff?“ls <br />Wetlln^*"^ «<=wetland areas and <br />5 ®“^veyor will be <br />J®f?**’y pi an. The <br />lould be employeed <br />ised preliminary <br />:«eVVn*^/„Vo%la- <br />Structures do not <br />^oposal. Lots 4, <br />sn* “eet the <br />50 front/street <br />'s, the City has <br />lot widths that <br />iriances would be <br />^cll. Lot 9 does <br />that Lot 9 be <br />P <br />mm.mm <br />.: ,;v. - ■ —^. .V- ■■;; <br />fW}mmmmiii;mmm:..:,*n ■:ii:: <br />m "iwa <br />t. -. •. . <br />mw^ <br />Ur-' -s •. 'wr <br />......?:s«S," i <br />mm <br />,........ <br />"■/''-■•ii <br />tr/- - ' •''..7:'"^■ -■ <br />- i.;v <br />V'jC > ‘^f • •• ' <br />RKgiitM <br />-■■■■■* ' <br />mm <br />f!-! <br />■c' <br />mmf-w*-iS»ste :■ <br />KilSl'p' <br />mmfiA^rndmm <br />•!. "'V -■>r: ,-;v , j<v "g-?;- 7" v <br />g-g'•■■!•. ■■'•^“ if;-' <br />:■ -r:;• .• •• <br />. r-g <br />liii <br />■^Wr- ■m <br />;;■ :■=;■■ ■ ;7-. <br />••1; J r .jJi.^ i-z.. <br />ym '- ■'.. r , I • - .^.'-"..' m--}^WWr-6?ifel' ig g : 1g v^*-. •, ♦■ g;;-:•>••■•■■ gg^gg/ •' <br />asli mmurnmmm_mm.m mBmi <br />f !i;.=:■■., „.r '-V-:^ ..r Xmmmm.t-::.;!ilii•7^~ •Zoning Pile #1411 June 16,1989 3 of 4 <br />2. ^adg^Access^ The Hennepin County Public Works <br />reaulre^*^°°* f*"^^** cul-de-sac road (Outlot C) will not require a variance. A 1,000' length limitation is only <br />the^e?^eifrf roadways. In the revised second draftT <br />to the east border has been placed <br />C is also placed within <br />portions of the designated wetland. The plat must be <br />the future extension at a minimum of 26* <br />In. ®* ’** elevation. This would <br />Si l...t oetlot C must bedesignated wetland. Per current <br />applicant would be offered the choice between <br />urban and rural sections. The urban section requires curb <br />radiuswidth from curb-to-curb; 40' adlus paved cul-de-sac. The rural section would reaulre a <br />once”a<Mlif width? 3' ditches on either side? andonce again a 40' radius paved cul-de-sac. <br />ll^ Wg^^and/Drainaaeways/Watershed. All of the wetlands <br />showTTon the staif 2ketk have been designated by the City <br />lS+'^i‘5 V’k ®^®®® except for the pond located^iXLot 13. The pond in Lot 13 appears to be more directlv <br />orovldlSa ^^®^"age from Parview on the south sideproviding overflow at the 956 elevation. The City will ask <br />thf Q?K®®f^*^i?" * Plowage Easements over this pond area to the 956 elevation. The Hennepin Soils Study classified the <br />®*^®« ®s a_low area with very pSorlv drained ^**® <br />Lots^6°LVVs««°"® of preliminary plan, the wetland between <br />and ^ appears to flow to the wetland within Lots 2 <br />ana 3. At a site inspection staff observed a dralnaoe oath <br />to*^+ho^ wetland to the south and may actually drain <br />3 flows directly to a wetland in the adjacent east orooertv <br />(review Exhibit H). The wetland within Lot^ 2 and 3 f l^w^ <br />Exhlblt^nf® %k'5®^^®"1 ^^® east property (review <br />oid^riv«?l*i ^®"? appears to flow out to the east toOld Crystal Bay Road and eventually to Prench Lake which is <br />in complete conflict with watershJd map (Exhibit cK ThiS <br />through the White Oak Circle neighborhood <br />^^®* wetland in Lot 12 haTz <br />to r>A,TA4 !?w outlet in the southwest corner appears <br />aonfh ^® !"®^®^i^y Of the flow flowing directly to the <br />heavv* ralSs '"°ifo4.K"°^^*'®5" culvert receives flow during the neavy rains. Both eventually flow to Stubb's Bay. ^ <br />mmsm^rn <br />■■■■ ••/ g-g /g.^;./^ <br />- ...... •; <br />....• .;•■ gg-.■::. <br />; •' . ■ ' ■ ■-•■»xi