Laserfiche WebLink
msmwm--; <ed to the Peterson <br />lere Is a 3-4* high <br />e survey and staff's <br />ly on the Peterson <br />de approximately 4* <br />s existing resldencer <br />: applicant to do the <br />sterson property from <br />lired to be submitted <br />.or to issuance of a <br />note that the house <br />minor overall grade <br />1 house generally is <br />^ the lot. <br />I request attached as <br />r than lots in the <br />my similar lakeshore <br />'utnam gazebo to the <br />ige lakeshore setback <br />was redevelopedr any <br />form with lakeshore <br />{uencer any attached <br />ire additional hard** <br />ultimately granted <br />i-250' zone. <br />in the 75-250' zone, <br />Lmately 180 s.f. of <br />Leant feels that the <br />itlon that he would <br />I of the reasons that <br />of the boat house. <br />t has not proposed a <br />a fairly extensive <br />i, between the garage <br />.leant could use this <br />Public Works Director <br />of a back-up apron in <br />f approve the gravel <br />M <br />:'™%V■ -9 . <br />K.> <br />■■Jmm <br />Mm-.r-- - '■ -S:- <br />'■ :-'r .m ■ : - <br />smmmM <br />r •: ,K%‘- <br />tvp-(fe,. i.-, ' ‘"**'<*^ <br />• ••• ' <br />. --v-i . <br />4 .. ..! .•• . •? •-.• f, * .•- • • ..;'’®isafeatKm«=• : ^ ™Zoning Pile #1422 June 15, 1989 Page 3 of 3 <br />Staff Recamswndatioa - <br />Planning Cononission feels that the proposed site plan is <br />appropriate, a recommendation for variance approval could make <br />the following findings: <br />1. Hardcover will decrease in the 0-75' zone. <br />2. The existing non—conforming detached garage will be <br />XMioved • <br />location is appropriate given the location of <br />neighboring residences in relation to the lakeshore, hence <br />the excess hardcover associated with the longer driveway is also appropriate. ^ <br />4. The proposed new residence will remove a neighborhood <br />eyesore, i.e. an old summer cabin which has not been used as <br />a full-time residence for at least 10 years. <br />5. Additional hardships include the fact that no additional <br />land is available, and that construction of a residence <br />nearer the road in order to meet hardcover standards would <br />not allow for lake views afforded to adjacent properties* <br />Appropriate conditions of approval would include: <br />1. R^oval of existing garage and residence including all <br />existing sidewalks. ^ <br />2. Applicant to provide a grading pJan to be reviewed and <br />by the City Engineer prior to Issuance of a building permit. <br />3. Optionally, Planning Commission should address whether a <br />back*-up apron must be provided* <br />1^ <br />«A‘- <br />- - i •' ■ V <br />[} <br />■ VV-; <br />, %