Laserfiche WebLink
strator <br />»1, 1/2 <br />: a new <br />ince. <br />89 <br />lerty in <br />emoved. <br />d. The <br />:ts to a <br />: width <br />gtrer the <br />nt. The <br />setback <br />sidence. <br />questing <br />Variance <br />4.5% <br />9.26% <br />■ .. <br />•««( <br />1*r: <br />■ • ■' <br />••.. <br />y**iS <br />u&MPfml <br />.■rV ^R-'. ' >v•A«#^>..'4P'-■ <•> r IfTO:^■Z - -P liMplii^- ....<Z'..'A a*‘- = .' ■ •:r :vi;.':iAliU \ V, <br />msm- / vmsmmm <br />■>,'■■■:'K 'smmm <br />Zoning File #1422 June 15, 1989 Page 2 of 3This lot is relatively high compared to the Peterson <br />property to the immediate north. There is a 3-4' high <br />concrete retaining wall which from the survey and staff's <br />site inspection appears to be mostly on the Peterson <br />property. The new residence will be approximately 4* <br />further back from the lot line than the existing residence, <br />hence there should be adequate room for applicant to do the <br />necessary grading work to protect the Peterson property from <br />run-off. <br />A detailed grading plan should be required to be submitted <br />and reviewed by the City Engineer prior to Issuance of a <br />building permit. However, staff would note that the house <br />elevations (Exhibit G) Indicate only minor overall grade <br />changes are anticipated. The proposed house generally is <br />designed to fit the existing contours of the lot. <br />Discnssicm - <br />Please review the applicant's letter of request attached as <br />Exhibit H. This lot is somewhat smaller than lots in the <br />immediate vacinity, but it is typical of many similar lakeshore <br />lots on Casco Point. <br />Applicant correctly notes that the Putnam gazebo to the <br />immediate south was recently granted an average lakeshore setback <br />variance anticipating that when Breitner's was redeveloped, any <br />new house would be moved forward to conform with lakeshore <br />setbacks in the neighborhood. As a consequence, any attached <br />garage proposed by the applicant will require additional hard­ <br />cover. Note that the Putnam property was ultimately granted <br />variances to allow 40.2% hardcover in the 75-250' zone. <br />In exchange for additional hardcover in the 75-250' zone, <br />applicant is proposing to remove approximately 180 s.f. of <br />sidewalk in the 0-75' zone. However applicant feels that the <br />existing boat house is in such good condition that he would <br />prefer to not remove it. He notes that one of the reasons that <br />he was attracted to the property was because of the boat house. <br />Finally, note that although applicant has not proposed a <br />back-up apron with the driveway, there is a fairly extensive <br />gravel area in front of the existing garage, between the garage <br />and paved portion of Casco Point Road. Applicant could use this <br />area as a back-up apron if necessary. The Public Works Director <br />notes he would probably approve development of a back-up apron in <br />the right-of-way, but also would certainly approve the gravel <br />area being reverted to lawn by the homeowner. <br />i <br />. ■: y ■ ■■ <br />■ :v- • ••V- ; •■.V . <br />mm <br />■ .V=." ■ <br />i.fc -m--: Hi|.f :' :-Fv'. mm.m: z--. ■..■im ' ■ ■: i-' .*'*'• "'.JiaaiiiK s i> ii <br />■ fCj <br />V :F^Haik2 <br />m:ri-'.;v <br />1 ■ ■ <br />r: : : ' ;F ; F • A" jsj- r. '■