Laserfiche WebLink
laced on notice that if contains 8.13 acres of required and that Lot 2 e private road. The Lan nay not be clear or has been a consistent <br />Ision of three or nore <br />» road. Because of the <br />Ills property^ the City <br />the new sites. It must <br />It if there is a future <br />K required. The future <br />emporary nature of the <br />division of Lot 1 as <br />rent proposal! <br />via Lot 3 baaed on <br />potential access via a <br />Lf Lot 1 is further <br />;cess easement must be <br />from Lot 3, applicant's <br />:reatedr ownership to <br />mended by applicant's <br />confirmed; OR <br />ts 1 and 2 via private <br />L improvements on Lot 2 <br />ity Roads 84 and 51 as <br />notice that if lot is <br />>nsible for the private <br />I access and that Lot 2 <br />rivate road. Lot 3 to <br />3 51. <br />ffron's memo reviewing <br />roved the following <br />• Vr-1. ^ :wm ¥r <br />Mm <br />■ ■ <br />mm <br />m <br />As.ms. <br />.•(S3mmm <br />mm m <br />v:s«.v <br />mm J ,-v ‘.2 <br />...Vi' <br />■s <br />f| fc;.' <br />.X <br />'"fc» <br />mmmmmmsM <br />mm <br />ai^HKF <br />■■■..M: <br />'•■4; ’ <br />mm,:--mm <br />p:<m0fi <br />-Vs. <br />9'.i '• • * <br />mm <br />':S3 mm-s,y--''‘lx-.. =■:*v»m 3=7^-''W3-..'Vfv.-, •m %:ki <br />i <br />-r.-..'m ^•0^- <br />m <br />mm <br />m. ‘-i <br />ay-rf- <br />wym <br />iiaA <br />^::' <br />m;. <br />. :M, <br />:ummamimy'[yrnymmy <br />r / <br />' : ■■■m <br />m mm^mm <br />.■.■■■■'•■:'' '■■3l <br />JSL*^ <br />■.yii <br />mm <br />Ms- <br />fmmm <br />.. . ;.,>.^V t"‘ <br />' .■ *, '. •mm: <br />»• <br />mmmm <br />' ■-■ >•■■' ■. » <br />; '■yvSiiKiWyg*jjiik* •■; .. :>.imm -: 'IMP■r’. S lt>. 4-7,4-r «.<ily: :ill /;■iiiiZoning File *1405 May 11, 1989 Page 5 of 5A) Bxisting house on Lot 2 will require additional septic testing for an alternate site. Prior to final approval, the City is to receive confirmation that a new septic system has been installed to serve existing residence. <br />B) All septic sites to be staked prior to final plat <br />approval. <br />C) Gaffron cautions against any change in the existing <br />access that serves Lots 2 and 3 because of the impact <br />upon Lot 3 and the need to preserve the gentler sloped <br />areas within the northwest portion of the lot. <br />Prior to RecommendytlQB-gor <br />1.Applicant to provide confirmation that Hennepin County <br />Highway Department has approved a new curb cut on County <br />Road 84. <br />Applicant's final determination regarding accessory <br />structure on Lot 1. <br />H^solve of access to interior lot. Lot 2. Reed to confirm <br />dry buildable contiguous area within Lot 3 as both easement <br />or outlot area must be excluded. <br />Applicant should also be advised that the area of the <br />property to the west of the driveway easement or out lot would <br />have to be excluded from the dry buildable area. Our code does <br />not allow the credit of areas divided by such easements or road <br />outlots . <br />miM4#H7iS'Sjii <br />pSmm <br />#'S <br />^?'-7S7y,v:? 'i: ? <br />■mm mmm <br />ill <br />iim <br />,>; <br />Ml <br />wmM: <br />v’^r.‘V# <br />77. <br />P: <br />.mkmm <br />tv. <br />sp <br />^Vl:’ ••• <br />yi'-' <br />.u'J <br />M'mmmm <br />m <br />__ <br />■ 3. <br />m- : i mm <br />y-' • • ■smm <br />rnyfys-^i^Mmsm <br />■’■92 <br />Ski-..' <br />.^r- <br />Mi <br />wsymmmmmrn Mm0m' <br />■ym <br />, '-m <br />; f ■ •yy <br />77: -,s ,yy <br />7-;¥ ■". - <br />.••3.•. ••■•.» .• ■■<:•. • -y-.mmMBrn