My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-1989 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989 Planning Packets
>
05-15-1989 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2023 3:52:05 PM
Creation date
11/15/2023 1:07:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lv • .^*Vw/^•V-:-S::.;/.-v'■ -:. i>-;irt^0iFormer residence I the creation of two acres of dry <br />.n the plat shall <br />lat and the City <br />ion easement over <br />nicipal Flowage t <br />ne rearrangement <br />d the Flowage k <br />ea. Please reler <br />ire and Exhibit E. <br />be served by the <br />new curb cut off <br />djacent to County <br />ay Department has <br />he applicant has <br />Applicant should <br />n being presented <br />leview - <br />t to the required <br />he 200* width at <br />:ructure does not <br />B newly proposed <br />maintained. The <br />I 10* side yard <br />only oversised <br />inimurn 30* side <br />lots have been <br />1 a lot that does <br />t may be asked to <br />cessory structure <br />2 requiring a 10* <br />s. It may be the <br />) make use of the <br />he same type of <br />structure as the <br />In other words* <br />'ed if a building <br />dence within one <br />at. If approved <br />• i:'-;- - <br />■ '■■\v a-V <br />■* <br />Ki <br />lii <br />hK-:- <br />mi*mm <br />^ ■ <br />. -f-. <br />ii <br />wmm <br />■;■' •■• ’.. •••• ;'?% <br />fflaa-u / > <br />f. -» <br />VlV^ri-.- I.; <br />m;9>^-'■‘•i■ -MI-iw:Mm i-r’’ <br />F T m <br />►:f <br />i i <br />i <br />wmmmm- <br />-*.>:• ••! <br />mf: <br />%-iZoning File fl405 May 11* 19S9 Page 4 of 5The future owner of Lot 1 should be placed on notice that if Lot 1 is to be further subdivided (Lot 1 contains 8.13 acres of dry land}* that a private road would be required and that Lot 2 would have to be served by that future private road. The ordinances and Coag>rehenslve Management Plan may not be clear or as restrictive on this matter* but it has been a consistent <br />policy of the City to require any subdivision of three or more <br />lots to be served by one interior private road. Because of the <br />configuration and proposed density of this property* the City <br />will consider the proposed access plan to the new sites. It must <br />be clear to the future owner of Lot 1 that if there is a future <br />subdivlslcHi* that a private road would be required. The future <br />owner of Lot 2 must be made aware of the temporary nature of the <br />southern access to the property of subdivision of Lot 1 as <br />planned. <br />Oondltioiis of Approval ** <br />1. Access options for Lot 2 based on current proposali <br />A) Approve access easement via Lot 3 based on <br />temporary aspect of access and potential access via a <br />private road to the north if Lot 1 is further <br />subdivided. The area of the access easement must be <br />excluded fr«R the dry buildable froai Lot 3* applicant's <br />surveyor to confirm; or <br />B) A 30* wide outlot to be created* ownership to <br />be shared. Area of lot to be amended by applicant's <br />surveyor* 2 acres dry contiguous confirmed; OR <br />C) Require shared accc.K«} for Lots 1 and 2 via private <br />drive from County Road 84 as all improvements on Lot 2 <br />suggest access from north. <br />2.Dedication of right-of-way for County Roads 84 and 51 as <br />sho%m on the plat. <br />•Place the future owner of Lot 1 on notice that if lot is <br />further subdivided* they will be responsible for the private <br />road to be constructed for the future access and that Lot 2 <br />will be required to access off the private road. Lot 3 to <br />retain existing access off County Road 51. <br />4.Septic* please review Exhibit D* Gaffron's memo reviewing <br />the septic test results. If approved the following <br />conditions to be considered: <br />.... m' <br />Wism^ <br />Baiiiiii <br />mmmmm <br />mmMmm <br />,v ■ <br />b’v •*fcilpal tofeM-9 <br />mmm <br />mm '-mmm -mm ^ <br />mk. jyMmml <br />faS9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.