05-15-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

■ F r?T*7^:v ■'we>-s,<rV':-- V. ... 4..*.=»'i.. '. V ;■17, 1989e owners and Ity is asking .s application he would be ,ot? Zoning r came to the tim to provide lership of the ider lying road nage pattern from the Golf ed runoff due rchasing. He removed that I said he was his property >f water that ected that at hole was dug wide and 4 to #ith silt and : of runoff. Club has the Commission is allowing any He said that :om occurring. to do to at may occur Be said he affron stated Engineer's :al of a plan Lspersed at a piested with equired for blic road, it meet the riances may over other ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||^|||||||^^ %:Sil i. j i:. :Fy»::;mwwlili. *mBDTBS OF THE PLAHHI9G COMMlSSlOH IffiBTIBG APRIL 17, 1989ZCTIBG FILS #1326-1IAXZATA COOHTRT CLUBMr. Downey said that the Country Club has been trying to comply with the requests from the City. He asked that the City's request for an additional 8' easement for the outlot be addressed. Kelley asked him how he would address the concerns expressed by Mr. Greig, Mr. Hauser and Mr. Simmons. Mr. Downey said that it was his understanding that Mr. Lauer intended to leave most of the property in a natural state. Mr. Downey said that once the subdivision is approved, the drainage problem would become Mr. Lauer'a responsibility. Planning Commissioner Johnson interjected that it wao his understanding that the Golf Course would participate in the construction of the retention pond. Mr. Simmons said that he did not understand how the subdivision could be approved without the City reviewing the actual house plans. Kelley concurred with Mr. Simmons adding that since this was such a sensitive area, it would be important to have more information as to the feasibility of what is being proposed. He said the fact that the City Engineer has revised his plan twice makes him even more leary. Planning Commissioner Cohen said that he had understood that Mr. Lauer was building a "spec" house, and did not Intend to live on the property. Cohen further expressed his concern over the construction destroying the private road which serves his pjfop^rty. He was also concerned about the access being located so close to the Golf Course. Mr. Lauer indicated that at this time he had not made a final decision as to whether he would live on the property or sell it. Mr. Brooke Nelson said that he had seen previous subdivisions approved and conditions changed after-the-fact that impacted surrounding properties. He wanted something more definite presented to him before this subdivision was approved Kelley asked Gaffron what specific requirements should be requested from the applicant prior to proceeding with development of this property. Gaffron said that City Staff would like to see the retention basin design reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Gaffron said that the remainder of this application could be presented to the Council, unless the Planning Commission preferred to have the matter come back before them again. Kelley asked if the actual grading plan for the proposed house would be provided. Mr. Lauer said that he had a 100* x 40 square in which the house is to be built so the grading plan can be determined. Kelley said that since the footprint and size of the house will be known, the runoff can be determined. He would like to see specific plans for grading and the retention pond on not only Mr. Lauer's property, but the Wayzata Country Club property as well. Kelley said that the City would take « fiowage and conservation easement across the pond. Kelley said ®y taking the easement, the City can go in and reomdy any vith the pond and assess the costs involved back to the prope y V': ■iOiS! fpi'; ';V ; ' Aisa •• :■ ’ V. ...v-» i'r-vV ::-y. -^.sy