Laserfiche WebLink
A:. ■■ •'■ ^•■r-■', i‘" - ^IL 17, 1989srs, electrical equired. Motion, <br />P.M. <br />ita Country Club, <br />auer. <br />Gaffron reported <br />Wayzata Country <br />s to the east to <br />ilso verified by <br />ion. A revised <br />(Wing the house <br />ibmitted and the <br />idicated that an <br />■on reminded the <br />Be plan was only <br />ise footprint is <br />he City Engineer <br />aed. <br />lot required to <br />s sensitivity of <br />■ovlslon was not <br />y asked how the <br />>roposed by the <br />Lon is approved, <br />n/grading plan <br />ced how the City <br />(acted by this <br />ve to rely upon <br />iroval and filed <br />IS that the City <br />stated that the <br />ling a retention <br />house, but also <br />nented that such <br />Lng Commission, <br />id the drainage <br />sting topography <br />le City Engineer <br />the Applicant's <br />iftant that the <br />lity to see what <br />acern over the <br />'erndale Road, <br />either side of <br />granted to the <br />smmm <br />■pPHP • <br />• .* V •• • . <br />• •• » .7 « .-msmi <br />11*-'■VrJSM Ki'fi <br />f: - <br />5T-;.V: .-vrv f,;: <br />■■ A-' . - ■ <br />liiliii <br />• •>'lv. • • •; •••■^ <br />JTBS OF THE PLAHHIHG COMMISSIOH MBBTIHG APRIL 17, 1989eAW^"wg wTT.w #1326'~IIAXZATA COOWTRT CLUB COHTIHOBD -varies property owners for current and future owners and development of the properties in that area. The City ^that a 25' private road outlot be provided with this application *« B»rt of the final plat. Mr. Hauser asked if he would be <br />required to provide property for a road outlot? <br />Siiiiii niatrator Mabusth answered that when Mr. Hauser came toth. city would ..k hi. to provide <br />iin rnrn^mmmnt. Th0 outlot would roxBaiti und^r th6 owii6rshlp of <br />“oS:?TSSi.r «d^« City «“i'i -’“iy underlying road <br />and utility easements. <br />Mr. A1 Greig had pictures showing the drainage pattern <br />through his property and his neighbors' properties from the Golf <br />Course. Mr. Greig expressed his concern of increased runoff d <br />t^fSe development of the property Mr. Lauer is P-^^Vv^'tha? <br />believed that once the brush and ground cover <br />there will be nothing to soak up the w»ter. He said he s <br />against having a retention pond put ^ ^^^atbecause it could overflow and create a channel of water that <br />would run through his property. ^®f°V’hole was^dugthe time the Golf Course was being developed, a hole was aug <br />behind his property that was approximately 30 feet wide a^^^ <br />5 feet deep. He said that hole is now filled in witn si it ana <br />other materials that have been deposited as a result of runoff. <br />Chalmuin K.ll.y .xpl.ln»a tl«t 5°'?;“yc™A.'’loB'i! <br />they could only protect the neighbors downstream. <br />M-r Lao Hauser asked what the City intended to do to <br />Ind^Sify th°. p«p*.«y own.« .g.ln.| “J. <br />as a result of this subdivision and development. He aaia <br />wanted to see it in writing from the City. <br />that"" t“hf“i ty^^sSi“/f *ctncu"r?^ J^?h"^tSr''?it?^En°g\^ <br />recommendat^^^^^^^ back*a^"d dispersed ^at a <br />slower pace. <br />Gaffron stated that there are <br />JSe pr^irty haviSg no direct frontage on a <br />iv hha lot is flag shaped and does not meet rne <br />Jequired 200^''width. Gaffron suggested \^® *othe^ <br />provide the Planning Commission with more control ove <br />related aspects. <br />Chairman Kelley questioned exiting <br />width variance. Gaffron said that the location of the existing <br />green and tee would be a hardship. <br />;S^:'yU;S.;a= <br />MMm m’y'v^-yT <br />V,;':-■ •- 1 ■■■ r:-■''7l‘ <br />k,- Jr ■;.■■■■ V <br />PfiiSt'" <br />A ' V mmfmiu <br />•V.A.; <br />V ■ r ; 'ir : <br />'.V " r; '* • •:-' V•• V•> <br />V ■'>!.' :'■■ '■•;.•• • <br />2 ' ■ - <br />1^8 <br />;V . <br />iSvii >j: Asa!