Laserfiche WebLink
rnmm4>- Vife&ilk ■:; • -; ,f'989■iluwignMI < OBBBen <br />o <br />him <br />so <br />redging <br />hr property* <br />r <br />d plats <br />ty five <br />ng <br />alter <br />d be <br />ine <br />At that <br />ative <br />aificantly <br />4CD <br />Strelow <br />r our <br />aeen no <br />i lines, <br />atal <br />las had <br />ition. <br />»m. <br />ITS the <br />i access. <br />SiHH <br />A'miliiK <br />.: - A <br />■■rr". ••;•.•• ••...■.■:• ■■■ : «■V .... ^ -■• .• V‘-.X'M .; :•-iv ■Ftbniafy 14.1989 <br />mvmM <br />X:.xXi'v-?-^'v.;. 'a <br />JawwA. Mahuslh Building & Zoning Adminilto City ororono CiyBtal Bay. MN 66323 <br />RE: Applicaflon of smew / Sisk «1370 <br />Osar Ms. Mabusth: <br />Ws am opposed to the lot nsarrangefnant a preposad by • 1370 Ibr m foikMvirv <br />reasons: <br />1. WO imlhred at 1340 Vina Plaoa since Febniary 1967. The Sisk property is <br />J adjacent to our property on the South aide. This property has ne^er had <br />j to the laks and sereral tfmes various reeltore hawe triad to sail this property as <br />lakeshore only to And out that this was not the case. I have carsiUlly reviewed the <br />applicalion and note the lack or permit by Mr. Labovsky to fill * along Lake <br />Minntsonka*. Why^iouldhe? This property has never had aooassl <br />Mr. Rask mo¥Sd into m SIreiow residenos in 1961 when this was a new house and <br />he was the first resident He moved out 1974. In 1961. the oontraclor had dug a canal <br />at this location (and also at the property on the East side) tor a boat slip. TNswas <br />done by a previous permit mendoned in a permit obtained by Mr. Rask to Till 20 feet of <br />sodatlng harbor*. Mr Rask toM me that the land in that area was a swamp. ThecaruUat <br />rnttime was located at the vary South aide of the lake in an area where the natural <br />llowage was non exialant and thus created a catch-all for unwanted debris, became an <br />eyesore, stagnant water became breeding grounds for mosquitoes, thus. Mr. Raskdid <br />nctwanttousethis-silp-forhisboat He then, by ONR permit, was allowed to fill in <br />the harbor and create a lawn that was more pieeeing to the eye. John Schoening then <br />didthework. Mr. Rask was kind enough «o send a letter and a sketch recalling what <br />the property looked like in 1961 whan he moved in. <br />^ By decreasing the Strelow shoreline by 6(7. will he be in oonibrmanoe with <br />LMCO Section Z01.eubd.2.b). regarding setbacks? Will the Sisk property be able to <br />conform? I understand that won now the smow dock is in violation of the LMCD <br />regulation and that no action has been taken or followed up on to correct the situation. <br />a IT this application were approved, the area where the allignment would take <br />piece is and has always been a part of the lake where the depth has never been over <br />12-18*deep. Even now, this area is notNng but sand due to the low vratM', and thne <br />ie about 40 - 6(7 of beach. The dock would have to extend weil beywid the allowable <br />maximum length as required by the LMCO, arKl would interfere with the present <br />location of the Stretow dock. Not to mention setback requirements. <br />■■■ ■f-'- <br />mm <br />: :-:vi... <br />.... <br />Vv'--=: •j-- <br />^ •’iijjjyis • <br />.. - .'X. <br />■ ■■■-w.k;..-. ■ <br />>AJt <br />mm-y <br />' i:' h'- ' <br />Mil■wmm&m <br />.: 'V ^ ’ <br />• .•I'...'.; <br />.\. ...^ : '•> . ^ <br />Wz'.y <br />mr mmm .V-■ •■. v.;y <br />f- ■•.. ■ . <br />■■• ^ - ,x. ... ^: I.:'. ". 'y '. <br />•.;: y.;Av;:v.,: <br />V xyy->V.-.\;''‘- 'i <br />^ y -sAmy.>. <br />*wy <br />■ ... A;V:...r <br />mm <br />. 1: <br />?t <br />V-.