Laserfiche WebLink
’4^m^i»i <br />?^s <br />r/3*S <br />TdMMMk. <br />■■ ill'’ <br />- t«- -p:...-P► <br />%■ <br />' ■ t::' V ‘ r;,ft^ <br />i <br />Vi. <br />mw. <br />^vj <br />iM^ -jjuQ^-e^ -pF <br />'■•l i.VC'^:i!«;iii.. <br />E, ::-v,E i; <br />lyi^7\J^, . I? <br />•I- ••*^. <br />-J -v ■*—..t ., <br />V * . •; <br />w'T ^lHV ^vV---:..-^': <br />I r - ,: V-V v:. .1 <br />i-'v. :;.•=•••'..v - .\V;vr. - :/ ;-.:^:;.-V-. ••V-mm <br />:'^yK}-~:.:i' Vl’-V-"W <br />i;^i <br />i <br />mf ^j :^- ;■.• : . ■ <br />>r:,. <br />I <br />^ .ff <br />**.T <br />V*"- <br />' .'4^ <br />:^.v.To; Jeanne HabusthBuilding and Zoning AdministratorMembers of the Orono Planning Commission RE: Application 11370 <br />We received your mailed notice that an application has been <br />submitted to allow Douglas Strelow to subdivide his lot to <br />permit lake access to the 4340 North Shore Drive west of him <br />where a speculation house has recently been built. We also <br />understand that an alternative being considered is the dredging <br />of an old channel to this same propety west of the Strelow property. <br />Our purpose in submitting this letter is to state our <br />objection to either of these two proposals. Though on old plats <br />s channel was identified, people who have lived here twenty five <br />years recall no such channel or remmants of a channel being <br />present. We believe dredging a channel would negatively alter <br />the shoreline. We also do not believe that Strelow should be <br />permitted to sub divide the 4330 North Shore Drive shoreline <br />property. Two years ago Strelow built a permanent dock <br />extending well into the water in front of our shoreline. At that <br />time we lodged a protest to the LMCD. The LMCD representative <br />investigated and determened that this dock indeed was significantly <br />out of compliance in its intrusion on our propety. The LMCD <br />attempted to contact Strelow several times but were unable <br />to overcome barriers to communication. During that time Strelow <br />docked boats east of this dock intruding even furthez over our <br />shoreline. In an already congested cove where there has been no <br />interest in remaining within dock requirements or property lines. <br />We belive dividing this property will only be more detremental <br />to us and our property. <br />Obviously aftre building the current dock, the LMCD has had <br />no influence in requiring the owners to comply with regulation. <br />Allowing further adaptations will only compound the problem. <br />In building the house on the property west of Strelows the <br />builders were clearly aware that the lot did not have lake access. <br />We beliew that the petition should be denied. <br />Sincerely, <br />■•I ^ '.V <br />•>• - ■V •• d <br />•'■ •••■■■-.v . :‘ ;v. <br />«v'#L' ‘ <br />i <br />rmmmm <br />V.vE: <br />!»■ <br />Ter and Jeanette Nltz <br />430d Worth Shore Drive <br />Wound, MN SS364 <br />49^*2410 <br />C. Tom Reese, LMCD <br />Jim Grabek Orono Mayor <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />k-:\\ <br />)•mVA■::ik,>\ ■ <br />• t}-. <br /># * <br />>.T. .1 <br />ne <br />'Vi <br />Ha’ll <br />m.Wim <br />.I.'-. i