01-17-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

for the appllcationr this week to resolve jveinentf specifically the deck location and :iday of this week for f the removal of the a room that will not iructure (14.1x6.7*)» iture will require a .ncipal and accessory Exhibit H, note the 3 the garage. The 6' :f. Staff questioned cture and the garage, cate the deck to the le additional area of ;oncurred noting that xpansion, but because hat in their amended the east side. This ing yard at that side Building Code, the openings within the ated (considered an ; wall must be rated that they would corner of the porch oors along the east )lan to locate their -v< - i Zoning Pile #1359 January 11, 1989 Page 3 of 3 The north garage wall and the east wall of the porch addition must be of fire resistant construction as follows: 5/8' sheet rock interior wall; 1/2' sheet rock along the outside of the wall with non-combustable siding. Applicants should designate a staircase to deck if access is desired from grade level. Review Exhibit B, applicants addendum in which reviewed as to why the applicant has choosen the south side t proposed improvement. Mature trees to the “^e .h. location of the we-.l on the south, the drop in elevations along the ea^ Side, and the fact that the house is a corner lot surrounded by Orono orchard Road on the west and Woodhill Avenue on the north. As Iona as the special construction standards are met because of the minimal separation of 3' per the assumed property line, ®*^***^““ concern with the request of the 6' separation princlcal structure. To expand to the west and reduce the north/south are mature trees. staff Recommendation - setback of 4' or 40% to the requiredTo approve the variance setuai-iv separation setback between structures on a property ^ * flndlnos propety located at 1315 Woodhill Avenue based on the hardships and fin g noted above subject to the following conditions: 1. prior to scheduling the application before the ““J action, applicants must provide an updated survey of the improvements approved by the Planning Commission. mm : i 2. All construction within the substandard setback subject to the standards of the Uniform Building Code, specifical y section 504 (c), that would tllow no openings within ^ J the addition and the north wall of the garage and all wall construction to be per 1-hour rating. \y. - ' - i Mi i 'Smrnmmm. :.r m-' r f ClTt Of Initial ($50. Renewal (no c After-t Proper Please Attach requir APPLIC R OWNER J 1 PRBSBI DBSCR VARU > •« '• •*u