Laserfiche WebLink
rator <br />me - <br />Dack - <br />ipplican'ts do not <br />setback variances <br />1 to the existing <br />Staff Recommendation <br />erty lines) <br />M <br />mm <br />P'H' <br />- :,-Si.: :: ^ y ‘i <br />gfs:. <br />^ •■■'- - > - ''-5 ■■ , .'mmm <br />mm <br />KIMkfyrtmfi <br />’> V -1' <br />i <br />B:i <br />• ■*^1' <br />ll -i <br />i1 <br />|j*'i9•9 <br />Zoning File #1359 <br />January 11» 1989 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Staff Update - Oonnents - <br />Uminarv review of the submittals for the applicationr <br />Based on preliminary revie o*rlier this week to resolve <br />TrllTl'lZ crS:u:tfonronT^. ?oSr <br />:r* Thirnerioc^u^ <br />inclusion in your packets. <br />Review of Application <br />The additions to the existing ^ith^rmud roL'^thlt will not <br />porch at the southwest principal structure (14.lx6.7-). <br />expand beyond the existing limi ' the ^structure will require a <br />porch and deck addition at accessory <br />setback variance to the required *^„^?Exhibit H. note the <br />structure at 10-. Review ;o t^ garage. The 6- <br />grade level deck located rxg a concern to staff. Staff questioned <br />why a deck would be squeezed in between the E relocate the deck to the <br />east side of the porch f "\te applicants concurred noting that <br />the treed sloping yard to the . future expansion, but because <br />they had planned a deck ooint. They advised that in their amended <br />of cost had to ^e the 6- wide deck along the east side. This <br />^tL“e" :T.:TJZ L7e\ railing because of the sloping yard at that side <br />of the house. <br />- _ on the Uniform Building Code^ the <br />Review Exhibit G, H and openings within the <br />assumed property line is 3 , and relocated (considered an <br />substandard setback area. The chimney „ust be rated <br />opening) and the door if it is to that they would <br />1-hour fire resistant. The “PP northwest corner of the porch <br />probably prefer relocating sliding glass doors along the east <br />addition. The floor plans also show sliding g <br />side. This will no longer be a concern as applicants p <br />deck along the east side of the porch addition. <br />>••3 <br />:1’ <br />Zoning <br />January <br />Page 3 <br />Th <br />of fire <br />wall; ^ <br />siding. <br />At <br />from gx <br />R< <br />review <br />propos <br />the lo <br />east s; <br />Orchar <br />A) <br />minima <br />concer <br />princi <br />dimena <br />the we <br />Steepe <br />preven <br />are ma <br />Staff <br />T <br />separi <br />propet <br />noted <br />1 <br />a <br />1 <br />2 <br />£ <br />clb. <br />t <br />c