Laserfiche WebLink
it —V., •mkM5 <br />through 60% to <br />rover allowance <br />I or mass of a <br />courage upward <br />north and west <br />iroperty owners, <br />terly existing <br />ihibit A) of the <br />planning. Staff <br />; 4. In staff's <br />igligible impact <br />with structural <br />structures, a <br />standard by the <br />, If height is <br />>rizontal plane <br />it by lessening <br />5' height would <br />side. This is <br />rds that would <br />»r level is not <br />applicable in <br />)efinition 13). <br />evations. For <br />r creative roof <br />ures, this might <br />i most certainly <br />barns, etc. The <br />f even that. <br />m <br />mt <br />mm <br />mw <br />mm <br />'# <br />mmr*AW' <br />f ■' "k <br />f'-W.vv-u; <br />S'--« .-...I <br />t ^Eia.« <br />' <br />«I <br />■ «mJLJ*MK: ' ' <br />Zoning File #1334 <br />January 12, 1989 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />■m <br />• T vvt'inV 4'h‘’a would be difficult <br />More Restrictive discussion at the Planning <br />for the developer to t,4idlna envelopes. The more restrictive the^hrirrp.rS" <br />options of Action - <br />p.a. 1 throaqh 4 bawd on th. following finding*. <br />controls on residential construction. <br />A. ^4^ PRD from 6 to 4 units slon^ th© <br />2. council's recent amendmen xessen the impact of the <br />rural residential boundary a property was developed at rural <br />higher densities to the south. If t property line at 1250 <br />2-aore standards, development a g densities with a 50' setbacklineal ^«et could have been-t S to^e ^lotjens^xt^^ <br />for construction of a princip <br />at a 10' setback. <br />TO ....011.» .d«l.lo».l control. '“Hr.'" <br />no -111 ....Olirt • nog.tw tr.c.d.l.t In th. r..l. <br />applications . <br />4. The additional landscape <br />boundary, the 100' wide no '=°'’ j,„u„a,rv have already addressed the <br />reduction of units along the nor neighbors. Visual impact <br />trcrrns^“reat:d by^ Vhe Lrof » -siaentia 1 n1:" <br />;orrr:r..v.d“;n“o?rT,ntinV o\r‘,r l.h...or./.^^^^ <br />development. <br />OR <br />the following additional controls for the residential <br />To recommend the followi g a-hrouah 4, as follows: <br />development of Lots 1 through 3 or Lots 1 through 4, <br />mm <br />■ 'I <br />ir <br />* I <br />j:-. <br />JH. <br />T''®'3 <br />1' <br />4^-A <br />[y M <br />u <br />ii <br />} <br />Zoning Fil« <br />January 12 <br />Page 5 of :